• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

Status
Not open for further replies.
Three inputs appear to be locked for a few hours:
q4cuhpX.png
 
my 2 duffs

RC4 "SHOULD" be released with the DRKlord Qt Wallet updated "look"/ appearance
but
RC4 can be and most likely will be released, as it stands. - plain

Depending on how you look at it, RC4 should be considered a "pre-release" to Version 1.x

The DRKlord Wallet updated "appearance" should come out on Ver 1.x
The NEW Wallet "look" that DRKlord is working on needs to be adapted to the DRK "environment"

Things change everyday around here and there is no need to really rush the "appearance" of DRK.

DRK = DRK
No matter what it looks like

(steps off the soap box)
 
MangledBlue said:
my 2 duffs

RC4 "SHOULD" be released with the DRKlord Qt Wallet updated "look"/ appearance
but
RC4 can be and most likely will be released, as it stands. - plain

Depending on how you look at it, RC4 should be considered a "pre-release" to Version 1.x

The DRKlord Wallet updated "appearance" should come out on Ver 1.x
The NEW Wallet "look" that DRKlord is working on needs to be adapted to the DRK "environment"

Things change everyday around here and there is no need to really rush the "appearance" of DRK.

DRK = DRK
No matter what it looks like

(steps off the soap box)
Click to expand...
Yes, a step release of darkcoin is a good idea. We could roll out masternode payment enforcement now, then the realese of darksend, then the GUI update and then IP ob.

Or is that the plan anyway?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
anyone has spare tDRK to spare? Not a lot please - mkeoGrgUFc4VTEDQYVWgUwj6FptEXcwr4S
 
yidakee said:
Likewise! Amazing efficiency!
Click to expand...
Edit:
100 sent
aa498c8c3c945383964f213befdc60f9b3573c97f5a89b0c9ae190fa48dfd374
I had 1700 tdrk anonymous, i sent 1000 of the anon tdrk and 700 coins stayed anonymous? It never used to do this.
On the previous version, i would send the 1000 and the other 700 would be unanon again and sent for denom. Is this a new thing?

1000 sent
049d410f1d4a8ff46817580704ebbcbdcb0d7374ba58eb02d1cc959a2868b303
 
Last edited by a moderator:
defunctec said:
Edit:
100 sent
aa498c8c3c945383964f213befdc60f9b3573c97f5a89b0c9ae190fa48dfd374
I had 1700 tdrk anonymous, i sent 1000 of the anon tdrk and 700 coins stayed anonymous? It never used to do this.
On the previous version, i would send the 1000 and the other 700 would be unanon again and sent for denom. Is this a new thing?

1000 sent
049d410f1d4a8ff46817580704ebbcbdcb0d7374ba58eb02d1cc959a2868b303
Click to expand...

Confirmed! Got here with the same ID
 
eduffield said:
****** Please Update To 10.12.18 or 9.12.18 *******

This version uses the new queuing system to seek out compatible transactions (where the same denominations are used). It's also enforcing these limitations now, so it might be a bit slower.

All transactions after this should look like this one:

http://test.explorer.darkcoin.fr/tx/6de2c5204abdea451da930f61bae0f954eef13188a3a37a572a24c9d92057d5d

Stable Binaries
http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/master-rc4/darkcoin-qt
http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/master-rc4/darkcoind

RC4 Binaries ( masternodes / auto-denom )
http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/rc4/darkcoin-qt
http://www.darkcoin.io/downloads/rc4/darkcoind
Click to expand...
CI-builds for v0.9.12.18

Windows 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/DWD-DRK/QTL/build-92/gitian-win-darkcoin-bin/32/darkcoin-qt.exe
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...tian-win-darkcoin-bin/32/daemon/darkcoind.exe

Mac OS X:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DOD-DRK-75/artifact/QTL/gitian-osx-darkcoin/DarkCoin-Qt.dmg

Linux 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/BL-DRK/QTL/build-68/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/32/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/BL-DRK/QTL/build-68/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/32/darkcoind

Linux 64bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/BL-DRK/QTL/build-71/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/64/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/BL-DRK/QTL/build-71/gitian-linux-darkcoin-bin/bin/64/darkcoind

CI-builds for v0.10.12.18

Windows 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...arkcoin-rc-darkcoin-qt-bin/32/darkcoin-qt.exe
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...coin-rc-darkcoind-bin/32/daemon/darkcoind.exe

Mac OS X:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/browse/DOD-DRKRC-9/artifact/QTL/gitian-osx-darkcoin-rc/DarkCoin-Qt.dmg

Linux 32bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...tian-linux-darkcoin-rc-bin/bin/32/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...gitian-linux-darkcoin-rc-bin/bin/32/darkcoind

Linux 64bit:
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...tian-linux-darkcoin-rc-bin/bin/64/darkcoin-qt
http://bamboo.darkcoin.qa/artifact/...gitian-linux-darkcoin-rc-bin/bin/64/darkcoind
 
When i send tdrk the coins are deducted from the total anon coins. The rest stay anon and don't get denominated again. Is that right?

Sent 100
c9ae87f3e1d073f6d1cf3fb92b07438a511e90c70287327f3365bbc96d659ae5
and then sent another 100
2ad05b8053784bfaea9103f3821f8073b7d88daabe202fc66fce12ce1224932d

Both where taken from the total amount of anon coins, and the rest of the anon coins did not go back for denomination. It didn't do that on the previous clients... Is that a new thing?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
defunctec said:
When i send tdrk the coins are deducted from the total anon coins. The rest stay anon and don't get denominated again. Is that right?

Sent 100
c9ae87f3e1d073f6d1cf3fb92b07438a511e90c70287327f3365bbc96d659ae5
and then sent another 100
2ad05b8053784bfaea9103f3821f8073b7d88daabe202fc66fce12ce1224932d

Both where taken from the total amount of anon coins, and the rest of the anon coins did not go back for denomination. It didn't do that on the previous clients... Is that a new thing?
Click to expand...
Yes, this client is a bit smarter than the last - reanonymising your whole remaining balance each time you send anything is pointless. :smile:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top