Thanx Nick. Hang around we are going to need a lot of input from the community to make this work.I agree there needs be a review committee of some sort. I've only skimmed a dozen or so and investigated two likely scam proposals - they amounted to tens of thousands lost that could have been avoided with proper due diligence (investigating the company: registered business name, trademark, copyrights, make some calls, etc.). I'm sure there's plenty more.
Good to hear from you - Yep - every time I think I've got an idea of what is needed, I realize there is another 100 details I haven't thought about. Little baby monster and growing fast. But that always happens doesn't it? Will PM you later this week@Biltong we should set up a skype call later this week, that's the fastest most efficient way to really get this going. This is as big project and undertaking as i'm sure you know. I'm thinking it will take at least an hour or so to get a solid game plan working and see where each other is at and what to expect in the next month. PM me when you are ready
Answers here https://goo.gl/Ug3uvDI still dont understand your proposal.
The evaluators are supposed to be the masternodes.
If we have paid evaluators, what will be the job of the masternodes?
Additionaly, how the evaluators will be nominated?
Can anyone become an evaluator?
Who will train them? Who will become the master evaluator?
Your proposal seems highly centralized. A master evaluator to rule them all.
Don't agree - I asked you to read higher up the thread where it was discussed before, but you did not bother to do that, did you? Go well DemoYou are trying to built a pyramid, an hierarchy, and a centralized system.
This is exactly what cryptocurrency tries to avoid.
Decentralization is the moto in most cryptocurrrencies, and this moto is inherited by bitcoin and the first pioneers of crypto.
So your idea is a reversed idea, better go propose something like that to a bank.
How would you do it then? Oh - and I really hate banks!
but we can't decide on a thousands of proposals per month. Can we? (MN owners)
Humans are not scalable.I think the 'monitor' procedure is a suggestion.
Interesting. Have you done a proposal for this already? Please post the link. If you haven’t – won’t it be a good idea to do a pre-proposal so we can see what you mean; how it will work and what will have to change to make it happen.By giving voting rights to as many people as you can, by voting the numbers, by implementing tree-like structured interdependant polls and by introducing people to the conditional votes. By giving to the voters the correct tools in order to be able to express themselves and to decide accurately.