qwizzie
Well-known member
According Glenn Austin (CFO of DCG) the Dash Trust Protectors have the following ways to introduce change :
According kot / Robert Wiecko (COO of DCG) the Dash DAO Irrevocable Trust is :
By directly initiating the creation of a decision proposal on behalf of an unknown group of masternode operators (https://www.dashcentral.org/p/Decision-Proposal-Improve-DCG) which influence the voting on that decision proposal considerably, the Dash Trust Protectors have overstepped their legally-defined mandates and lost their neutrality and objectivity in the proces.
I think the only way to restore that is for the Dash Trust Protectors to step down and issue new elections for the Dash Trust Protectors.
Key would be to make sure every new candidate understand his or her legal mandates and pledge to honor the neutrality of the Dash Trust Protectors position.
If there is an unwillingness among the Dash Trust Protectors to do that, then i think a decision proposal should be launched that lets us poll the network.
Source : below mentioned Dash Central decision proposal (see comments)Trust protectors were intended to initiate change through the following mechanisms:
- Own the shares of DCG
- As shareholders, reassign the DCG board if the masternodes instruct it to do so
- Assign or hire the trustee of the Trust
- Hold other passive assets that ultimately belong to the network such as patents or trademarks assigned to it by
DCG or other legal entities, and enforce any associated licensing requirements
According kot / Robert Wiecko (COO of DCG) the Dash DAO Irrevocable Trust is :
Source : below mentioned Dash Central decision proposal (see comments)a legal entity that has defined certain legalstatus and Trust Protectors have their mandates described there. Here is a description shared a long time ago by Ryan: https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/dash-core-group-legal-structure-details.39848/#post-193885
By directly initiating the creation of a decision proposal on behalf of an unknown group of masternode operators (https://www.dashcentral.org/p/Decision-Proposal-Improve-DCG) which influence the voting on that decision proposal considerably, the Dash Trust Protectors have overstepped their legally-defined mandates and lost their neutrality and objectivity in the proces.
I think the only way to restore that is for the Dash Trust Protectors to step down and issue new elections for the Dash Trust Protectors.
Key would be to make sure every new candidate understand his or her legal mandates and pledge to honor the neutrality of the Dash Trust Protectors position.
If there is an unwillingness among the Dash Trust Protectors to do that, then i think a decision proposal should be launched that lets us poll the network.
Last edited: