Not again this argument of Non Disclosure Agreement!!!! This is exactly the argument used for Evo-DashPlatform, 6 years ago!!!!
And here we are now, in this awfull situation where no Evo-DashPlatform is relased yet, and where the Dash developers coded a Frankenstein monster
tottaly different from what the Dash community expected .
EITHER the masternodes will be smart enough to refuse the NDA argument, fire those who are using it, and give governance guidelines to the developers, OR a new failure for the Dash network (similar to the Evo/DashPlatform which for the last 3.5 years costed to the Dash community about 15 million dollars
!!!!!) is coming.
DashUnicorn MNO 1 point,1 day ago
Sadly, this is what a dying project looks like. The team will keep getting smaller and smaller, delivering less and less, until the money runs out. The whole idea of Dash Evolution was a mistake, it is turning Dash into something that is definitely not Dash. The core team has been leading us on this wild goose chase for years as they run around directionless. This latest fiasco with high performance masternodes is a perfect example of how this whole thing is being built with popsicle sticks and elmers glue. We need to wake up and face the music. DCG has failed; the network should scrap it and find someone else to take over with a fresh vision, but at this point it might be too late to save us.
quantumexplorer (proposal owner) MNO 1 point,18 hours agoRecently posted!
The point of evolution was to evolve. The "wild goose chase" as you said it is coming to an end. The direction has been very focused as seen by our github activity on delivering Platform. DCG has not failed. DCG will be asking the network how they want to start Platform.
DashUnicorn MNO 1 point,3 hours agoRecently posted!
Evolve into what? What is the competitive use case other than devs geeking out about merkle trees inside trees? Other projects already have us outclassed and outfunded in terms of data storage, computation, and digital identity, because their projects were properly designed for their specific use cases from the beginning, not something haphazardly glued on top of a digital cash coin as an afterthought, winging everything on the fly because some devs thought we can just do everything and be everything to everyone. The only reason MNOs are still going along with it is because it is a desperation play, because we have nothing else to try between now and our inevitable bankruptcy. Now that HPMNs have been introduced, MNOs are finally starting to pay attention since this is something that actually affects us. We'll see where this goes, but to me the Evolution project is likely doomed to endless bugs and no real utility. The whole idea should have been scrapped when Evan left.
In the meantime many delete vote signals
appear for the recent DCG proposal....Look at MNOwatch's signals delete
The first operator includes all people who do not cast vote-delete signals. All the rest are identified by the way they vote.
1 operator(s) control(s) 4170 masternode(s)
1 operator(s) control(s) 0262 masternode(s)
2 operator(s) control(s) 0001 masternode(s)