If we knew the active proposals during Dec-17, Jan-18,Feb-18 and Mar-18 maybe we could extract the desired information from the buggy "the_results_dashd" files.
The one who has 97/115/137 MN's/votes is not the biggest "whale".
He is just the biggest whale who votes.
He is also the biggest whale who does not use voting obfuscation.
the_results_dashd_29-07-2018.html
The first operator includes all people who abstain. All the rest are identified by the way they vote.
1 operator(s) control(s) 002525 masternode(s)
1 operator(s) control(s) 000118 masternode(s)
1 operator(s) control(s) 000114 masternode(s)...
the_results_dashd_01-04-2018.html
The first operator includes all people who abstain. All the rest are identified by the way they vote.
1 operator(s) control(s) 002453 masternode(s)
1 operator(s) control(s) 000097 masternode(s)
1 operator(s) control(s) 000082 masternode(s)...
the_results_dashd_31-12-2017.html (buggy version. contains also the zomby proposals, thats why the one masternode owners are so many)
The first operator includes all people who abstain. All the rest are identified by the way they vote.
1 operator(s) control(s) 002211 masternode(s)
1...
And here is the result file created by using data provided by dashninja.pl
This file contains what ALL masternodes (online and offline) voted, for ALL proposals, during 2017.
Beware, the file is huge. Be patient when loading it into your firefox browser. As with the previous files, this is not...
I post some data from the banned mnowatch github site.
I am afraid some of them are not accurate, because initially the shellscript took into account not only the active proposals but also the zombies ones.
This bug was fixed in the_results_dashd_01-04-2018.html and after.
They are .gz files.
Yes of course, but the ideal is for the shared masternodes to be able to vote too.
It is not very complicated to add voting capabilities in a shared Masternode. Just ask the MNshareholders to give a separate dash address, even empty. Then assign to that address the number of the shares. Then...
We should mark those who officialy declare that they do not vote at all (Neptune e.t.c) and then the 10% that is required for a proposal to pass, should be calculated when we exclude Neptune e.t.c from the total MN population.
2994 didnt vote!!!!! :confused::confused::confused::eek::eek::eek:
What shall we do to them? o_O
Tax them for not voiting? :rolleyes::p
Seize their voting rights for the next budget cycle? :rolleyes: :cool:
Lets post a special proposal in the next budget saying:
"Those who will not vote into...
I ran the script in my dashd, during the three days period that the payment occurs, but the results and the distribution were not identical to yours.
I was wondering, what is the reason of this incompatibility?