but nodes could just be checked in case of an instant tx, couldn't they? nodes have to be connected anyway during the election process
minimum_nodes connected could be 70% of the average of the last 2 months or something.
maybe the number of nodes could be found in the blockchain by scanning...
i've got a question concerning instantx,
i read all the possible attacks through in the white paper, but what happens if the masternode network is ddos attacked and some bad actor masternodes overtake the network for a short period.
wouldn't that be a scenario for doublespending?
unconfirmed funds are still included when selecting "non anon funds", wouldn't it be better to see just the real spendable balance?
btw. what does it mean when darksend status says : "ERROR: not compatible with existing transactions"
btw. shouldn't coins switch to total balance after 6 confs?
i have unconfirmed ones showing up in total after 1 confirmation..
it confused me a bit because when i try to send non anonymous funds the unconfirmed ones are included in the balance shown (non-anon-funds) but it says not enough funds..
so splitting in 5k pieces before denomination is not a solution right?
it was discussed on the previous page..
wouldn't it be possible that the user could determine the hard limit of the wallet?
im a bit confused on page 33 there is v0.9.12.9
but it always gets stuck on block 34163.
on page 34 evan posted ****** Please Update To 10.12.9 or 9.12.9 *******..
is that the same version number?
Hi, im new on drktalk, much more interesting to read :)
I've got a question, somewhere on bcttalk i read that there are plans on implementing I2P, is that right?
btw. is it theoretically possible to determine the origin IP of a txbroadcast, if there would be enough clients run by a "bad actor"...