• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

Search results

  1. superplus

    v0.10.16.x Testing

    but nodes could just be checked in case of an instant tx, couldn't they? nodes have to be connected anyway during the election process minimum_nodes connected could be 70% of the average of the last 2 months or something. maybe the number of nodes could be found in the blockchain by scanning...
  2. superplus

    v0.10.16.x Testing

    i don't think so, a well organized ddos and some mn are way easier to accomplish
  3. superplus

    v0.10.16.x Testing

    i've got a question concerning instantx, i read all the possible attacks through in the white paper, but what happens if the masternode network is ddos attacked and some bad actor masternodes overtake the network for a short period. wouldn't that be a scenario for doublespending?
  4. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    unconfirmed funds are still included when selecting "non anon funds", wouldn't it be better to see just the real spendable balance? btw. what does it mean when darksend status says : "ERROR: not compatible with existing transactions"
  5. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    btw. shouldn't coins switch to total balance after 6 confs? i have unconfirmed ones showing up in total after 1 confirmation.. it confused me a bit because when i try to send non anonymous funds the unconfirmed ones are included in the balance shown (non-anon-funds) but it says not enough funds..
  6. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    so splitting in 5k pieces before denomination is not a solution right? it was discussed on the previous page.. wouldn't it be possible that the user could determine the hard limit of the wallet?
  7. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    also thought of that, would be nice to have no limit :)
  8. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    maybe Darksend Denominate/Anonymization Fee would be more clear..
  9. superplus

    RC4 Development and Path Going Forward

    ha nice its planned :)
  10. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    how long does it usually take to start denominating? btw. would be great to get that faucet working for main net :grin:
  11. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    got it already thx :)
  12. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    thanks i missed that :)
  13. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    but there is no testnet3 folder, just got regular folder structure /DarkCoin/wallet.dat,chain state etc..
  14. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    or is your build from page 33 not suitable for the new chain? can't compile the binaries from page 34 on this machine :(
  15. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    where should this folder be, or do you mean my dark coin folder? i backed up wallet and reopened dark coin but still gets stuck..
  16. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    im a bit confused on page 33 there is v0.9.12.9 but it always gets stuck on block 34163. on page 34 evan posted ****** Please Update To 10.12.9 or 9.12.9 *******.. is that the same version number?
  17. superplus

    v0.10.12.x RC4 Testing

    latest builds available?
  18. superplus

    RC4 Development and Path Going Forward

    Hi, im new on drktalk, much more interesting to read :) I've got a question, somewhere on bcttalk i read that there are plans on implementing I2P, is that right? btw. is it theoretically possible to determine the origin IP of a txbroadcast, if there would be enough clients run by a "bad actor"...
Back
Top