Search results

It's funny. There are soooo many different forks of electrum currently for this and every single one of them has inconsistencies with each other. For instance akhavr's is using 111 for the testnet type but I think that repository was authored before the switch of address types. Quick question...

https://github.com/Propulsions/electrum-drk-server/tree/testnet vertoe Working Testnet Version. No need to go home anymore. ;) Database size for 10000 is only 15MB's.

New thread! Make a request.

Funny thing with testnet. Check this out: https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/issues/541 In short, there is no testnet! Everything will have to be modified for it specifically. I'll make a new repository called electrum-drk-server-tn. It'll be operational by the end of this week and will...

I had two servers connected yesterday. We shouldn't be seeing the Bitcoin electrum Servers in the peers list though. Bah, testnet? Go big or go home Vertoe. ;) (really though that's a decent idea.)

IRC has some issues. I believe we're still connecting to the bitcoin IRC network. Here's an unrelated error. It's showing that as my hostname. [16/02/2015-05:44:22] joining IRC [16/02/2015-05:44:33] gethostbyname error blockchain.fh-biergarten.de Doing electrum-drk-server peers returns this...

https://github.com/Propulsions/electrum-drk-server Everything has been updated and should be fully functional. There is a KISS instructions located in the src to get you started. Seems like we're now ready to tackle the client. If you can spare some time to set up the server and test it out...

Thanks ELM4ever. I've been tied up with the mining pool all day but I'll try to update the repositories and get a server from a MN set up on IRC before the end of the day.

Woops, alright great! Is E_WhynotMe you? Also can you email me your blockchain_headers? I'll host them today.

vertoe, right now the configuration doesn't add the directories. The default is /var/electrum-drk-server you have to manually make it, it's the same way with the regular Bitcoin electrum. In short, when creating a server for the first time, you need to install the hash in src/darkcoin_hash...

Quoting myself ;) The server shouldn't even need the subsidy function since it should be pulling it from the daemon directly. I'm still not sure why it's reporting wrong. All of it can be accomplished by polling the daemon. pooloperator@drkServ:~$ darkcoind getblockhash 2...

Thanks Corpo. Not many people have it set to strict. Nonetheless, I'll update it today, I didn't realize that it wasn't updated. Appreciate it!

It's almost ready. The "Coins in Database" is still reporting wrong. We'll definitely need some heavy duty servers if using the maximum pruning size of 1k but I believe we should be able to run this on a MN if it's set to the default of 100.

Lol awesome Yidakee. y9RuivASms4rLdC1LNHQhsg7YhFTJgCrVR

So looks like over the weekend there was a new testnet chain. Goodbye my 10k tdrk.

I'm stuck 40 hours behind. Am I on a bad chain? Edit: Yup. I lost all my tdrk. :(

Left wallet running all day anonymizing 2k Tdrk through 10 rounds. My last transaction is a "conflicted tx" Transaction ID: 5c24d17d1e7860bf94c156bc57f421a66d5952d89b57a204c055a0f3e32d78a4-000

Isn't this fun?

Alright. I've imported the hash function from p2pool. I'm able to start and stop the server with no issues. Once again, I'm rebuilding the full blockchain_headers file from scratch. The only thing that looks concerning is the coin count: $ ./run_electrum_server INFO:drkelectrum:Starting...

That could be it. Though, looking at Poolers source code for the old version the only time he messed with the POW was for the actual electrum-client and not the server. With litecoin using scrypt instead of sha256 I'd assume if it was needed it would need to be edited in both the server and...