Search results

Again, I stated if we're going the onion routing method, then there will be increased latency which may or may not work for the masternode network to secure IX tx's and DS.

Absolutely, but if that's the case, certainly there will be larger ramifications for crypto in general (any full node out there).

Do you have a masternode address so I can see how it appears in the masternode list running a node through tor?

Other than the fact that the IP address will show up on the masternode list further proving it is, in fact, running a masternode.

It all comes back to whether or not it's illegal to run a masternode and for nearly all countries, it isn't. Further, unless you are setting your masternode up on a VPS that takes DRK, your anonymity is already compromised. Further, the majority of existing masternodes won't change out their IP...

That's already possible... open port 9999 on your IP and then multiple datadir and config files with new RPC ports.

I'd love to hear his thoughts on cryptocurrency (namely privacy).

I think that's a dangerous path to go down since those mixing right now are so sporadic and with some parts of the day experiencing more activity than others instead of consistency across the board. With such a large masternode population, I think it's safe to say many would be screwed with the...

Masternode blinding is happening regardless of what happens with IPs.

The probabilities of deanonymizing a DS transaction, especially over a large number of rounds is already very slim as the percentage of the majority you would need to own would be substantial (and substantial capital investment behind it). Further blinding masternodes from all the "inputs"...

Just to clarify, no coins from any user flow through any masternode. The coins are mixed intrawallet. There is a misconception going around that anyone that uses Darksend has their coins flow through the masternodes themselves. This is not the case.

For those of you advocating the IP's shouldn't shown, try to view it in the context of the existing network. While some owners are certainly willing to setup new masternodes under different IPs (now hidden), the far more probable scenario is the majority of the network stays on the same IP's...

Whenever you have stuck tx's that don't get broadcast, use -zapwallettxes

So in a POS type sale environment, a person would IX their funds to buy an item but would need to effectively leave the wallet open for the tx to remain via IX and not revert to regular POW? The second they close their wallet, the tx becomes regular POW and the merchant is in the same place as...

I like it... you're effectively summing the total inputs for whatever number round the rounds column tells you. Probably won't be needing 9 rounds after Evan finishes masternode blinding: https://github.com/darkcoin/darkcoin/commits/masternode-blinding

Probably watching a movie with his honey on Vday.

eduffield Network is forked ATM by the looks of things. Various block explorers stalled at various blocks with about an hour of no new blocks found.

InstantX is for the receiver to know that the funds are as good as theirs for POS type sales without having to wait the long and drawn out process of finding blocks via POW for confirmations. For all intensive purposes, it works as it should.

It's not the private key of the address holding the funds, no.

Only after a POW confirm can you resend those funds. You can't IX until 6 POW confirms.