Search results

Sure, there are some cases where it might be useful to have a better way for the network to negotiate with proposal owners. However if I would be putting this on a priority list on a scale of 1 to 10, it would be at about 0. The current system is sufficient and there are many more important...

Many projects are unique to the proposal owner -- it's not like a software project where the masternodes get to spec everything out and just anyone can do it. If someone proposes to sponsor the Crypto Show, or sponsor Dash Aerosports, or do an airdrop on Huobi, how many other people are going to...

Why pay out the money at all though if the contractor is not going to do it? In the current system, the proposer can always try a lower amount if they are willing to do that after their original proposal is voted down.

It can't work this way because it allows for the possibility for Masternodes to vote to pay out less than the contractor is willing to accept, in which case the contractor has no obligation to actually do the work. If a proposal owner needs their payment to be denominated in fiat, just use an...

Better get on that then! Only 7 days left for voting

Personally, I generally have a favorable view of Ben Swann, but I agree that this is a possible issue. Some of the things Swann has reported on have been extremely controversial -- I don't think we should gloss over or under-represent this. A sponsorship deal may be seen as an endorsement of...

@dashdisciple What do you think about https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/google-adwords.21389/ Wouldn't there be an overlap of efforts here?

missing the option for "5 dash" :D

Yes, but in order to get big marketing agencies on board, this probably happens more through networking and making phone calls, not so much videos. We already have formed a business relationship with Ogilvy & Mather -- one of the largest marketing agencies in the world. I am sure they did not...

You can't expect the amount of good proposals to catch up instantly to fill the entire budget when the price triples over 2 months. If you want to spend $10mil on stuff there need to be people who are actually able and willing to do it. Are you saying there are 100 people who would each be...

The treasury is dying, seriously? Almost every month we are setting a new record for the amount of money being spent. There are 30 proposals up for voting right now, 16 of them are brand new for this month and the budget cycle isn't even completed yet. The number of proposals that have been...

I'm not really a fan of having a generic sub-DAO act as a catch-all for any small proposals. The people best equipped to evaluate small or local proposals are the people closest to that location or area of expertise. I would be fine with funding regional teams or teams that have a clearly laid...

What OS/browser are you using?

I don't think there can be an automatic way to assign scores...otherwise people can put whatever into the forms without any quality control. And as for manual scoring, there was already an attempt at that with the Proposal Evaluation Committee (PEC) which didn't really succeed.

Yeah it doesn't matter if the "base fee" is $0.01 if the wallets aren't smart enough to know that they can send less than $0.40. Hopefully the algorithm can be adjusted to be more accurate

I would be open to the idea of a sub-dao but I think the scaling is already occurring somewhat naturally. It is getting much more common now for proposers to represent companies or teams of more than one person. Having hundreds/thousands of sub-$10,000 projects is not going to be the way to go...

If you're going to create a topic to ask where to create a topic, you might as well just post it here. Or come to the discord channel and use the #bitcart channel to try to get support.

I don't consider the hosting costs to be an "additional investment". The investment was the purchasing of the collateral. With your reasoning, anyone that has a masternode share with one of the sharing services has infinite ROI because they are paid interest denominated in dash without paying...

Masternodes gained $10,000 for each $100 contribution -- yes, just like everyone else. Plus an additional $800. Not plus an additional $7500.

No, but a lot of non-masternodes made $10,000 on each of their $100 contributions, and the ones who bought Masternodes made $10,800 on each of their $100 contributions.