Search results

Indeed, a mistake. Our positive feedback is dominated by a very negative minority. It seems, that it needs to be spelled out in bold and all upper case: POSITIVE FEEDBACK. With all the very good explanations from Sam, the 10k-HPMN solution seems to be the best choice for the first release. The...

Who are "we all"? I guess, that you speak about 4-5 individuals here on the forum. But there are certainly some hundreds of MNOs, and even more Dash users. Yes, because only a vote will really show, if, and how much we all are divided. P.S.: I've only 1k, but I'll vote for the 10k-HPMN...

I'm still not sure, if this is right. Could you please comment on my question for Sam please?

Without an additional collateral for the HPMNs, almost all MNs (because hardware is cheap and gets cheaper every day) would switch to HPMNs with the already mentioned downsides.

This is just an example. You could also say 45% / 40% / 5% / 10%, or whatever...

Some further thoughts: 1.) Issue with stopping quorum: It seems, that the impact of a stopping quorum is not so dramatic, since the devs voted for the 4k-HPMN solution (highest chance to be able to stop a quorum). That means, that a high collateral is not a big requirement. 2k should be enough...

Sorry, I don't understand/find the answers. For how long: perhaps maximum 24h, because this is the maximal duration of the quorum? Impact: perhaps no impact at all, because there are 23 other quorums, that could to the job? Self-correct: perhaps yes, after one hour (new quorum appears), or yes...

I would like to know this too...

I don't think so. Again: Platform MNs are supposed to provide Core services too.

Ok. But then, why would the reward increase, when some of the MNOs switch the "platform" toggle? I guess, that I don't understand your logic...

I don't think so, but I can be wrong. This is, what I've understood: The reward for Core services is distributed among all MNs (platform=0 and platform=1). The reward for Platform services is distributed among all MNs with platform=1.

That was an error, sorry. I've edited my post.

No, "platform=1" MNs still run Core. So they are in the same pool. "platform=1" MNs will get additional payments.

This is just normal optimisation, that will always happen. The rule is: keep the hardware costs as low as possible, but high enough to avoid being banned. Let's imagine an additional income of 5% for the Platform part: So 50 Dash per year. With actual Dash price it's more than 2000€/year. For...

I don't think so, because almost any MNO would choose "platform=1", since hardware is so cheap and gets cheaper every day.

I would vote for: HPMNs, because of the mitigation of the risk, that a problem with Platform brings down all MNs. Keeping 1k as collateral for a simple MN, because it makes the transition smooth. 2k as collateral for a HPMN, because: The barrier of entry to Platform shouldn't be too high...

From Sam's (IMHO good) explanations, I understand the following (that could be completely wrong): 1.) Core and Platform are 2 different software packages, and run independently. 2.) Core is responsible for IS/CL and so on. 3.) Platform is responsible for contact information, running DAPPs and so...

Ok, then I did not understand very well Sam Westrich at 49:00. I'll need to improve my English...

Hi, If I understand it right, you'll implement "pre-proposal: let MNOs determine proposal fee". Thank you very much!

Hi, I guess, that the left one is a joke. For the right one, I would say: rather "dash.org" than "Digital Cash". The curious people would then probably go to the web-site and educate themself. IMO, it would be nice to produce such t-shirts and sell them here to Dash-enthusiasts. I would buy 1 or...