Search results

EDIT: I skipped that one, but will take another look at it.

+1 for tor-integrated wallets Of course. If Dash sucked nobody would waste their time posting here.

Fun fact: Did you know Amanda did in fact make videos covering basic economics years ago?

It would probably improve your chances if you can prove you are enrolled on a masters course at a university. And what organization would be the beneficiary of the 1 Dash donation?

A while ago the core team would made a bunch of "catch-all" proposals that would be up-voted just enough to pass so as not to get in the way of real proposals and would go to something like a "core savings account" - it would actually go to attend conferences they didn't expect to have the money...

You mean, like this pre-proposal?

Sounds interesting, but I fear (hope) the DAPI will made it obsolete, and there wouldn't be much time for this project to bring fruits. I'm also curious about what are the answers to @ampp 's questions.

In other threads I voiced my willingness to pay people to evaluate proposals, might as well be a "committee". But JZA has a point. If we could somehow gamify proposal evaluation in a form of interactive site... for example, one section could be a vetting checklist where each participant says...

The service doesn't need a masternode to be functional, it just needs a normal node. I know you have real concerns, but you are truly behaving like a troll.

Nowhere, because people wouldn't register multiple accounts in the forum just to have one vote in a poll for each masternode they own. But perhaps this proposal could implement such a system. PS: All this translation talk made me change my vote. If people are going to whine for free...

While I think there is no problem right now, I think it might be in the future. We have a lot of pre-proposals to sift through, but not that many proposals. Anyway, I don't think a FBH is a good solution. I'd rather pay someone (maybe more than one person so to have different opinions) to review...

Seems it could be useful. Something like trello.com card voting? I expect strict privacy/anonymity safeguards, with absolutely no personal information asked for access, not even an e-mail. I suppose MNOs can be qualified by either: having them sign a message; or (for the purpose of this test)...

Ok, then. Convince me there is a significant demand for it. Ask around in the international section and get MN badge-wearing forum users to post something like "I don't understand English and need proposals translated" in a dedicated thread.

@GrandMasterDash The end user never needs to know anything about the DDGB. You don't need to know how a company runs to use their product, you use it because it works. Dash's whitepapers, tutorials, faqs, how-tos, advertisements, wallets, costumer support, etc should be available in every...

Select the team of independent accountants and make a proposal. Anyone can do it, you don't even have to be a MN.

We are hopefully about to lower the proposal cost from ~$500 to ~$100. If you want your proposal translated, hire a translator.

IMO a paper wallet's private key should only be read and used once, at the act of sweeping (transferring it to a wallet). (as side note - paper "wallet" is a misnomer, since it's not really a wallet, just a key pair)

I voted for this proposal. I figured in a couple of months it would already have gotten a year's worth of funding (as asked originally) and we could downvote it then.

If someone wants to burn US$200k worth of Dash, I'm all for it.

We could address this with sporks and MN spork voting. For example, a mutually exclusive set: SPORK_21_PROPOSAL_FEE_0_5_DASH": false (253 Y / 410 N / -157 NET) SPORK_22_PROPOSAL_FEE_1_DASH": true (569 Y / 102 N / 467 NET) SPORK_23_PROPOSAL_FEE_2_DASH": false (125 Y / 117 N / 8 NET)...