Search results

@Anonymous Dude A masternode is a SERVER. We won't need more masternodes unless there is a technical reason for the network needing more servers. Should the MN count drop, this could be arranged, but right now we are at an all time high. If its just "interest" that you want, you will get that...

Why are you keeping vote history for this very poll if you already said won't recognize the results? You don't have to prove anything to anybody if no one cares about vote history. Keep it in a notepad on your local computer.

I'm tired of seeing there is a new message in a thread, and when I go to read it then it turns up to be a shitty vote history by @demo. Does anyone find it useful at all?

Yeah, that sounds nice, but I have to agree with camo, we have to have vendors who accept Dash as an option before they would want to accept it exclusively (how would they pay for their inputs?).

The MN crashed right around when 0.12.1.1 was released, then it refused to sync back up. Might be a coincidence, but...

Pretty lame conspiracy if you have to publicly announce it IMO. You will never know.

Sure! Go ahead and make the proposal, I'll support it!

This same thing happened to me after the release, and upgrading did the trick. Maybe 0.12.1.1 broke compatibility with 0.12.1.0?

If MNs don't vote in a proposal, it could mean they don't care if it passes or not, or that the votes counted so far indicate the option they would choose would pass, or that they didn't want to bother with voting at all. Unless an "abstain" vote option is implemented, you can't tell anything...

This earns the Ackbar seal of approval.

Let me fix this proposal for you: Budget Breakdown (* is optional) 7,50 Dash - (Expected Monthly rewards from Masternode1) - Goes directly to the Foundation Fund 7,50 Dash* - (Expected Monthly rewards from Masternode2) - Goes to offsetting development / Running costs and marketing Dash Total...

Can you post a video introducing your team members, and maybe give a tour of your offices? Could you post the Foundation statute? One of the major metrics when evaluating charities is overhead costs. What is the expected running cost of maintaining the foundation? How would this money be spent?

@David Ok, then, let me put this in perspective. Using the screenshot above, in the last 24h there were 544 blocks found, of which 36 were paid incorrectly, at a loss to masternodes of 1,94 Dash per block. So, every 24h, about 69,84 Dash. In two weeks, 977,76 Dash are lost in this way. At...

Hum... just saying

Ok, but when did we vote on this issue? We voted for a dash representative to attend a conference, that's all. We were never asked if we'd like a partnership with Coinfirm.

We already do everything fiat aims to do and better (in the eyes of the user). Maybe in the eyes of the government we don't. Okay, then, I challenge you. Show me a Dash anonymized transaction in the coinfirm explorer that has a clean rating. If it doesn't exist, it means they are useless, and if...

@TanteStefana No, I can't accept this. If this would mean firms can't accept an anonymised Dash payment just because it is a large payment, we are doing it wrong. No, there is no risk when accepting instantsend payments over the dash network. If there was a risk, you would than have to accept...

Well, just because they can't. That's why I oppose them on principle. PS: But I'm curious about what they would say about an anonymized dash transaction,

I beg to differ, this firm absolutely does spy on the blockchain. That is the very reason we aspire for fungibility, so that some coins are not worth less than other just because of where they've been. But otherwise I agree with you. Hayek FTW

It's not a secret formula. Any core dev that wanted to do it this way, could.