Search results

  1. Bridgewater

    Dash Governance compared to Ethereum

    I've got a small factual correction, too Should be changed to "later that year" or late 2014 or something to that effect. It currently reads as if masternodes were added to the network in late 2015.
  2. Bridgewater

    InstantX/InstantSend

    Forgive my ignorance, but is there a reason we cannot have all transactions be spendlock/locksend/quickconfirm/lock'n'send/instawhateverX by default? That way, there's no need to name it except in marketing materials, as it is a default function of the coin itself (which would makes the...
  3. Bridgewater

    Online Bank

    Interesting. The website says they're incorporated in hong kong. The things I would be curious about are how they're insured and for how much, and also which jurisdiction's financial privacy laws they must comply with.
  4. Bridgewater

    V12.1 Testnet Launch Thread

    You could always send a tiny amount first. If after you receive it, you can use the trezor to spend from that input, then you're in control. You can also generate Electrum/Trezor receiving addresses on a completely offline computer, which eliminates the risk of those addresses getting hacked.
  5. Bridgewater

    V12.1 Testnet Launch Thread

    As far as trusting the Trezor hardware itself goes, there are hundreds of pages on bitcointalk dedicated to just that. There is nothing secret about the Trezor and its history from idea to final product is well known and documented. Granted, when you use any peice of mass-manufactured hardware...
  6. Bridgewater

    V12.1 Testnet Launch Thread

    The entire setup process can be done offline, no account necessary. The chrome extension can be built and installed on an offline computer (https://github.com/trezor/trezor-chrome-extension) if you want to use Chromium to setup the Trezor. It is also possible to setup the Trezor with an...
  7. Bridgewater

    V12.1 Testnet Launch Thread

    I know it's off topic but this is technically incorrect. There's no way an OS backdoor/malware/virus can snoop the Trezor's PIN. Passphrases, yes because they are entered in plaintext via the host computer's keyboard (which renders the passphrase option mostly useless, except for the $5 wrench...
  8. Bridgewater

    Dash now on KeepKey

    I was doing an advanced setup with Electrum, and at the point when you're supposed to unplug and plug it into an offline computer with text editor to backup the seed, it just got stuck and was never again detected by the computer. Tried everything, Ledger starter, firmware update, etc. nothing...
  9. Bridgewater

    Hacked

    @fible1 , Although nothing was looted now, it does not mean that malicious entities are 100% not in possession of encrypted password databases, wallet.dats, or encrypted zip files with private keys/passwords inside. If they think they stumbled on a gold mine, they can rent sufficient processing...
  10. Bridgewater

    Dash now on KeepKey

    I have all three, too. Ledger nano is the only one that broke on me, and does not allow use of passphrase wallets. It only has a pin and that's it. Keepkey has a slight advantage over the Trezor in that it allows cypher input of the mnemonics. With Trezor, best practice is to create new...
  11. Bridgewater

    Evolution will also be a bitcoin wallet

    This makes sense. Unless I'm mistaken, Evolution is a platform (not necessarily an end-user wallet) that allows easy integration of unique dash features through the new DAPI. The whole point is to encourage widespread adoption of the currency itself by using it in all kinds of different ways...
  12. Bridgewater

    Coinbase

    Because Charlie Lee, of course! It's all about him, remember?
  13. Bridgewater

    Proposal: Electrum KeepKey Hardware Wallet Integration

    This is great, especially since there are probably more KeepKey owners now with the recent price drop to $99.
  14. Bridgewater

    What would you like to see changed/implemented on New Forum

    First off, the new forum seriously rocks. I love all the new features and buttons. I use those post navigation buttons exclusively now. Both themes look marvelous, too. One minor suggestion/question: When you scroll down to the point that the big "DASH / Forum" logo disappears, would it be...
  15. Bridgewater

    is SMUT still active ?

    The better question would be, is the lone crouton still active? I used an early version of SMUT, but have long since switched to @moocowmoo 's dashman and snapped off the rearviews.
  16. Bridgewater

    Governance based on decentralized reputation

    Attempting to decouple money from merit is at least anti-capitalistic. Socialism is the assumed motivator, but there could be others. There's also totalitarianism, anarchy or the complete demise of human civilization as end-goals. It all boils down to people trying "fix" a system that is...
  17. Bridgewater

    (Non-Binding) Wallet Terms Vote

    Thanks tungfa !
  18. Bridgewater

    (Non-Binding) Wallet Terms Vote

    So we're still going to have public dash and private dash? Or is this just a branding choice for an interim solution? What happened to the plan of all Dash being private by default, in interest of fungibility? I liked the idea of all dash being mixed by default, then allowing (through...
  19. Bridgewater

    Darksend Rebranding Discussion

    It seems to me like the name depends upon the feature implementation in the software interface. If it is a global setting, i.e. a "privacy mode," then PrivacyProtect seems appropriate. If it is a per-transaction choice of how to send funds, then PrivateSend seems appropriate.
  20. Bridgewater

    Governance based on decentralized reputation

    We already have money, which represents all of those things already. That's what allowed shareholders/masternode operators the power to be just that. Voting power should absolutely not be tied to arbitrarily-valued contributions. Like Tante said, that's socialism. For example, the boss of...
Back
Top