Search results

  1. JGCMiner

    v0.11.0.x Core Testing

    Is there are working faucet? If not, please send some tDRKs. y4DvkAYUh3pnzHs9fRTTcQGHESWBXsjBmK
  2. JGCMiner

    v0.11.0.x Core Testing

    Any update on a working windows client? Dying to test the new and improved Darksend...
  3. JGCMiner

    Some question about DRK Total issued and Daily production

    That is correct. The difficultly changes every block via Dark Gravity Wave (similar to Kimoto's Gravity Well). Also that formula has a max of 25 coins and a min of 5 coins where the min is reduced by 7% every year (first reduction is this Janurary).
  4. JGCMiner

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Haven't had a chance to test any of the recent versions yet. Just thought that might be the case as the 100 denom is back. Apparently not...
  5. JGCMiner

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Like the fact that the 100 denomination is back because it makes it easier to anonymize large amounts. Was the 2000 DRK mixing limit lifted as well?
  6. JGCMiner

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Haven't most of those been addressed? Other than yesterday's diatribe on reedit of questionable believability...
  7. JGCMiner

    v0.10.17.x Testing

    Well without the 100 denom level it will be difficult to do much more without major bloat. I would say it is temporary until change contracts.
  8. JGCMiner

    Change Contracts using Atomic Transfers

    I agree. :smile:
  9. JGCMiner

    Change Contracts using Atomic Transfers

    I understand the sentiment, but I worry about going down the slippery slope of mandatory donations even if the cause is worthy. I don't think most will mind the transaction fee idea as there is a way to get their coins back, but if we do go with mandatory donations it might be best to do a...
  10. JGCMiner

    Change Contracts using Atomic Transfers

    Putting aside what development is more important, I agree with the general trend of the conversation. Allow merchants to price at ~1 cent granularity, i.e. add 0.1 AND 0.01 denominations, and then trucate any excess and send it to the miners/MNs as a transaction fee automatically. As the price...
  11. JGCMiner

    Change Contracts using Atomic Transfers

    I think your second and third points are not really issues. As Oblox says above, the sender is overpaying and the receiver signs a contract to return the excess. There should be no problem sending to a wallet with 0 balance and multiple iterations to get the exact change are not necessary as I...
  12. JGCMiner

    Dead Change - an anonymity issue

    Ok. Then they slit their own wrist... That is still better than forcing "donations" on EVERYBODY. As far as I understand you can only hurt yourself with your dead change. Spending dead change willfully in the face of a warning is the same as using Bitcoin or not bothering to ever turn on...
  13. JGCMiner

    Dead Change - an anonymity issue

    I agree mandatory "donations" is a really REALLY bad idea. If we are going to go with an idea like this, then the best bet is to keep things as they are and just add a 0.1 denomination. If somebody tries spend change then give a warning and the OPTION to donate. Also, are we sure there is no...
  14. JGCMiner

    Dead Change - an anonymity issue

    I think Aswan is referring to a situation where the change is less than 1 and thus cannot be remixed. Furthermore, due to the use of 10.00000001 as a denomination rather 10, if you try to combine change less than 1 to get to a denominable amount you will always end up with a few "duffs" left...
  15. JGCMiner

    v0.10.16 - Onyx v2

    Unlike previous versions, v.16 works extremely well in my case. On mainnet, several hundred coins finished 8 rounds in about 12hours and all without fees. :grin: Excellent work dev team!
  16. JGCMiner

    v0.10.16 - Onyx v2

    Yeah. It is especially odd since the older v12 worked fine except for the high fees. Not sure what is going on. Anyway will run overnight to see if it mixes.
  17. JGCMiner

    v0.10.16 - Onyx v2

    Hmm, having trouble mixing again with v.15. Lots of the "last Darksend was too recent" errors...
  18. JGCMiner

    v0.10.16 - Onyx v2

    Yeah currently the cost is quite high for something that has "zero-fees". :tongue: Well, I am confident Evan will get it sorted in short order. He always does.
  19. JGCMiner

    v0.10.16 - Onyx v2

    Looking more closely at my transaction list, I also got hit with 3 0.1 fees in just 8 rounds. That is much more expensive compared to previously. Evan, is this the intended behavior or do you think there may be a bug?
  20. JGCMiner

    v0.10.16 - Onyx v2

    There is no "collateral" anymore. You will be charged 0.1 "randomly" while you are using Darksend. This is to prevent DOS and other Sybil like attacks from occurring for free. The charge should be rare according to Evan in the first post, so it looks like you had a run of bad luck. Of course...
Back
Top