Search results

So then what exactly has his competence done besides use the existing Darkcoin base (now old)? If it wasn't about the lack of pools (workarounds being collateral deposits or multi-sig), what "innovations" has he done?

Looking at difficulty now isn't going to anything if the pool is back on the right fork. Again, the coins mined disappear because you are on the wrong chain during that time. You can't have two chains of mined coins and then have them merge back into one--one chain is going to be orphaned...

...because enforcement isn't on while the network migrates to the latest Core wallet. Without enforcement, miners are free to skip paying the masternodes if they want and keep the whole block reward for themselves. When enforcement is on, if they aren't paying masternodes the accurate payout...

...and it would make sense that you lost every transaction if you were mining on a bad fork. You don't magically get to keep what you mined if you happen to be mining on a bad fork and solve blocks. When you reindexed, did you make sure to delete your peers.dat first before the reindex?

If you're losing money, you're doing it wrong. Probably a Vultr whore like everyone else.

Hard to really gauge... enforcement hasn't been on all the time, uptime on his masternode could be problematic, variance with increasing masternode count.

Again, enforcement is not on so you bitching about your payments is useless. I pay $0.80/mo per masternode... I make far more than that off revenue, even on lagging nodes when enforcement is off. Find a different host.

I am just pointing out the post from Evan not saying I agree or disagree with the decision. I agree, it was easy to tell whether or not it was on with getcheckpoint but that no longer seems to be the case. True decentralization is without the reference node. I don't think it makes sense to...

https://darkcointalk.org/threads/0-11-0-darkcoin-core-release.3601/page-25#post-38015

It's hardcoded at the moment but not reflective of whether or not "enforcement" is on. Confusing, I know.

Enforcement is still off while the majority updates (has to be close for turning back on but Evan is still looking for fragmentation on the network). It was on briefly before the fork happened.

If testnet isn't proving to be a good battleground representative of mainnet, why not create a test coin that is merge mined with DRK? Not sure if there is a way to have the existing masternode network function on both though. The nodes would still be setup using the primary blockchain...

You can specify the min of odds when you place the bet. Doesn't mean you'll get them though.

I'm certainly not complaining with rounds going longer but what's the deal with 16 rounds being the end point and going into 17. I realize it's the same as the old 8 round max going into 9 but why is it not able to stop after the round cap? What logic is causing it to push end +1?

V13 will be pushed yet today.

Haven't seen any issues like that with my setup using start-many.

Has nothing to do with the current structure of when rewards jump--it's block based, not based on how many blocks were successful in masternode payouts.

Dude, we get it, but it's a growing pain for the network to get to majority so we don't deal with forks again. I don't think any masternode owner is thrilled with enforcement off... that's a given.

We've been through this before with Onyx...

Windows 64-Bit App crashed overnight: Problem signature: Problem Event Name: APPCRASH Application Name: darkcoin-qt.exe Application Version: 0.11.0.11 Application Timestamp: 52cf3800 Fault Module Name: darkcoin-qt.exe Fault Module Version: 0.11.0.11 Fault Module...