Search results

No. Is this one of those updates? I hate it when I have to dig out my cold wallets and do all that crap...why do some updates require that? I never have understood it! P.S. I now see 3 MNs on the list...none of them are mine though =(

Just updated, but the command: ./darkcoind masternode list ...shows nothing. Not mine, not anybody elses!

At what block do the 30% rewards for MNs kick in?

Out of curiosity, why was Block 165662 accepted (Nicehash, no MN payment) if enforcement was turned on at 165660? Does it take awhile for the enforcement command to propagate around the network? http://explorer.darkcoin.fr/block/0000000000019377ed29a84fd80501f4619e471126f3b77d7c902506e37ec8d9

This is beyond preposterous for two reasons: a) You're going to dilute my DRK holdings to merge us with some shitcoin nobody has ever heard of? b) You have the power to do so? Isn't crypto all about decentralization and math-based consensus to a (relatively) immutable basic protocol? I realize...

I'm afraid this is going to cause confusion because people will automatically think something is wrong with their masternodes, when that is not the case at all.

This is *extremely* interesting. You could take this beyond mere arbitrage. Bitcoin could be sent nearly instantly in the same way (albeit by using exchanges). David wants to send 3 BTC to Ashley. David has his 3 BTC on Cryptsy. David buys 3 BTC worth of DRK and uses InstantX to transfer the...

Are masternodes required to update as well, or just pools? I never am clear on these types of things...

Can somebody come out with a Vultr image that's fully locked-down to allow hot wallets to run safely? I don't know nearly enough about Linux to feel like I could secure hundreds of dollars worth of DRK, but I'd be more than happy to run it if I I could be confident in the server being...

I agree, why not just get rid of "mining" altogether and have the MNs secure the network?

eduffield Evan could you take a look at this if you have a few moments?

According to https://drk.mn/blocks.html Nicehash found blocks 141533, 141527, 141525, 141524, 141521, 141520...etc. Of those, I got paid 0.1 DRK from two of them: 141533 and 141521 If their pool was misconfigured to somehow pay only one MN, why would it only happen 1/3 of the time? And happen...

Up until Monday it was RC4. Monday during mid-day I took the MN offline and updated to RC5, but I didn't restart it from my cold wallet until yesterday evening. At that time, of course, it was (and still is) running RC5. All told, that MN was down for approx. 30 hours and was still getting paid...

I wonder how it is possible to pay a masternode that is OFFLINE. My MN was down for 24 - 30 hours and I still got paid during that time (approx. 3 PM Central Time on Monday to 7 PM Central Time last night).

Wow. That's pretty insane! I guess it'll last 2.5 more weeks until their ass gets kicked off the network from the spork =)

I see that now...how bizarre. Why would I get so many per day, and how would I get paid even when that MN was down all day yesterday?

I thought about that, but it can't be for two reasons. First, I'm getting 8-10 per day, which is WAY too high for MN payments, and secondly, my MNs were down all day yesterday (pending update) and I STILL got 10 payments! I have mined with this address before, but not in months... The only...

Can y'all take a look at this address and tell me what's going on? I'm getting MULTIPLE 0.1 DRK payments per day, in addition to my normal masternode payments: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/address.dws?XtzrcCsxS3eA3LejArCt7F7BdWC33MR9ry.htm

I'm *not* an expert, but as I understand it, when the system denominates it adds an extra duff to each denomination, but then when it begins mixing, that duff is removed as part of the .0125 DRK fee. I agree that it could be confusing though. Perhaps the client should "hide" those from the...

I think you may be right: Q: Are you actually Satoshi? A: Yes.