Search results

That's actually not a bad question. I'm guessing that there is some limit to the number of instant transactions MNOs can process, but I have no idea what it could be. It would be great if someone that has more knowledge about the Dash coding would comment.

Nobody said that hardforks are bad per se. Dash had a hardfork recently, when block size was raised to 2 MB. Contentious hard forks are the ones that are not good and Bitcoin had a number of those.

Don't forget that Bitcoin price fell to $300 in 2014.

I still don't understand why you even got into Dash? You don't seem to believe in its core principles which were plain to see and you could read about them before you invested anything. Just searching for profit, I suppose, because at that time it seemed you could make more with the same...

Which is just as it should be, because we don't want to be Bitcoin. Bitcoin is paralyzed by indecision for years and now had 3 (soon 4) hard forks which split the community. I switched to Dash from Bitcoin just because I didn't like how Bitcoin functions.

It seems so... but they don't understand that it would simply kill the value of Dash and they would be even worse off. Thankfully, miners don't decide the future of Dash.

In the video, there is also a button for "Withdraw DASH from Ripple", so I guess the answer is yes.

I think he wanted an option to define a custom fee, not to be limited to default and zero fee as options.

Why would I risk my investment by conciously making bad decisions for the future of the network? It seems to me that you are the one that wanted to make a quick profit, because you don't really seem to believe in Dash. Personally, I don't like lightning networks. It involves third parties and...

Exactly. I could sell my MNO and join some other crypto, if I think it has a better future than Dash. But I don't see any at the moment, so I stay.

They will stay if they see a healthy development and rising of the value of their holdings. Why would they want to be poor? Also, they are already free. Free to go to some other cryptocurrency if they like it better. Dash is not a democracy. It's a corporation.

Personally, I think Bitcoin has too many miners right now. Bitcoin mining uses as much electricity as a small sized european country. We don't really need more hashing power at the moment. Also, any ASIC dump would not work, as nobody would buy them with the current profitability. Why would the...

I got into Dash because I like how it works now. So yes, I would stay in the "old" Dash.

I don't get the "undercirculated" argument. Cryptocurrencies are highly divisible. There is no lack of currency for anyone that wants to buy it. Anyone that really wants to buy and use Dash is already doing so. Raising the supply of coins on the market would just drop the price sharply. Well, I...

The idea is to raise the value of Dash until mining is profitable again. Can someone of you miners make a calculation what price of Dash would that be?

Miners vote with their hashing power. You could lower the MNO reward, but then a big number of MNOs would probably sell off their holdings and drop the price at least 50%. Then you would again be where you started, mining would be unprofitable. Also, when MNO requirements raise sharply after...

Considering that MNOs hold more than 50% of the coins in circulation, they are the biggest stake holders. It is future proof. When mining is profitable, more miners will come. When it's not, miners will leave. It's how it's supposed to work.

But that's how it's supposed to work. Bitcoin works that way, too. It just a little slower when adjusting the difficulty.

Go ahead. It's your right, of course. I'm just curious what exactly would you change in that forked coin, so it would be more profitable for the miners?

If some miners leave, the difficulty will drop and the profitability for the miners that are left will rise. It's simple supply and demand.