Recent content by virgile

It would in theory do the same... If you quadruple the amount of nodes supporting platform compared to a 4 solution because then the top whale would get 4 times as much nodes. Beside this issue, i only see downsides compared to shares+4K or w.e-is-higher-than-1K+shares.

i just saw QE quoted me to check how it'd look like on platform side. I'll do it tomorrow as i finished my day of work.

Think for a second about what you propose. you're talking of a square rolling wheel ;)

Just a heads up. If your idea still relies on timelock + 1K collaterals + a hard limit on the number of nodes, i will have to staunchly disagree and give my advice to the community wide and large, as this in fact is insecure. Not to mention the "lack of collateral differenciation" related...

We'll adress that in the incoming FAQ, but basically the tldr is: if you look at node distribution among owners, 4/10K is better with bonus point if you have shares. If you care about the amount of nodes, well that's a parameter to set. You surely have in mind other projects which have lots of...

We both know that feedback before any discussion even happened isn't really telling is it not? If you scroll back far enough you will also find negative feedback from xqc probably, i know he was against the idea of not enforcing platform on all nodes at first, and then he came back a few days...

I went over 5 pages in a few minutes, it was indeed only you few. And a person making a lighthearted joke and two persons being neutral. But yeah, i don't know why we are discussing that. Point is if you are the majority you don't need to point that out usually...

It's the same handful persons commenting negatively in both threads though. We let the 3-4 of you voice your negative feedback for almost 18 pages, Let them voice their positive feedback for a comment or two, aren't you a proponent of free speech?

Thank you, such comments are appreciated. Indeed positive feedback is important as well. We are but a tool of the network and if the network only points out when things go wrong, we cannot know when things go right. what does DTRT?

Yes, it's something to keep in mind indeed that Platform is not made for payments, credits are just here to pay masternodes for the storage services, so without checking the values/calculations, i can certainly say that your estimates are logical.

Now this is a discourse that we can have, that's proper talk. Thank you for getting it back on healthier tracks for both of us and being the bigger man. I appreciate it. I should have not mentioned duffield and I apologize. I do not understand why you would downvote our proposals if our...

Oh sorry, I forgot to answer. Imo it is the best solution. I think 10K is too much and that the best approach is iterative with lower fees such as 2-3-4K at first and gradually going up. That would be more annoying for the operators supporting platform as they'd have to upgrade perhaps twice...

You have stated it like 10 times already. I just don't understand why you keep on stating it. We get it, you hate the change, you were promised ridiculous non functional things by evan duffield years ago and now QE tries to make a functional product and you're angry evan duffield lied to you...

Also, yeah. This is a blatant lie. We talked about it multiple times, just ctrl+f "yield". I will not accept such lie and i don't understand how the community's standard is so low that it enables such statements.

No worries, i was not going to. If i missed something earlier on though i apologize and i will gladly answer it. Have you read the past 5 or so pages? i have participated a bunch and in there somewhere i answered to the same questions over and over on why it is problematic. I can repeat again...