Separate names with a comma.
Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!
Yeah I think we should learn from this. In hindsight I think it's clear that the last-24h-limit was a bad idea in this case. The intention is...
Nah, the progress % is over 4% so we need 80% registration, which is very unlikely. Looks like we need to wait another month. Oh well!
I wonder at what time on March 8th the conditions will be evaluated.
Deterministic: 2775 (59.60%)
24h progress: +94 (2.02%)
S15: if 24h progress < 0.63%
Last registration: 6 min ago
Like was mentioned here before we are more likely to see a spike in registrations the last 24h than a sudden drop.
Yes, it's a bit strange that...
From what I understand the logic behind the rules are that we allow a lower total percentage of activated nodes if the registration process slows...
No, 4% is not less than 1.25% :)
Or have I completely misunderstood the rules?
Yes. My point was that the registration rate is stable at around 4%, which is above the 1.25% limit. Looking at the trend it looks unlikely that...
The registration rate has been pretty constant at 200 / 24h (about 4%) for the last few days, except for some occasional spikes upwards. The rate...
:facepalm I mixed up march and may. Time to get some sleep! :D
Dates. May 2nd to May 8th.
Yeah, you might be right. In which case we won't make the May 8th target.
Yeah, looks like we manage to hit some kind of worst kind scenario here. Some wild guess on how we progress from here:
Time Share Change
I think the point was that the test releases should be labeled beta releases (e.g. beta 1, beta 2 etc) rather than release candidates (rc1, rc2 etc).
I just read about BTCPay, the open Bitpay alternative:
Support for additional altcoin...