• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

V12 Testing Thread

crowning said:
Yep, 249 synced slow as hell here but at least it did.
Click to expand...
Udjin's reply (on Slack) to my comment about the slow syncing:

"udjinm6[9:35 PM]yep, that’s due to another lock in ProcessMessage… this was a safety one afaik and hopefully it’s here only until we find the root of “hung” issue"
 
UdjinM6
Tried send some coins back to the faucet, with instantx.
All funds had 7 confirmations and still got this error:
"InstantX requires inputs with at least 6 confirmations, you might need to wait a few minutes and try again."

Why?
 
V12 Launch Was Successful :cool:

~# dash_c spork active
{
"SPORK_2_INSTANTX" : true,
"SPORK_3_INSTANTX_BLOCK_FILTERING" : true,
"SPORK_5_MAX_VALUE" : true,
"SPORK_7_MASTERNODE_SCANNING" : true,
"SPORK_8_MASTERNODE_PAYMENT_ENFORCEMENT" : true,
"SPORK_9_MASTERNODE_BUDGET_ENFORCEMENT" : true,
"SPORK_10_MASTERNODE_PAY_UPDATED_NODES" : true,
"SPORK_11_RESET_BUDGET" : true,
"SPORK_12_RECONSIDER_BLOCKS" : true,
"SPORK_13_ENABLE_SUPERBLOCKS" : true
}
 
Only about 31 total masternodes on testnet right now but IX seems working well:

upload_2015-8-3_12-5-0.png
 
AjM said:
UdjinM6
Tried send some coins back to the faucet, with instantx.
All funds had 7 confirmations and still got this error:
"InstantX requires inputs with at least 6 confirmations, you might need to wait a few minutes and try again."

Why?
Click to expand...

They require 6-block level confirmations. Was the previous input sent via IX?
 
eduffield said:
V12 Launch Was Successful :cool:

~# dash_c spork active
{
"SPORK_2_INSTANTX" : true,
"SPORK_3_INSTANTX_BLOCK_FILTERING" : true,
"SPORK_5_MAX_VALUE" : true,
"SPORK_7_MASTERNODE_SCANNING" : true,
"SPORK_8_MASTERNODE_PAYMENT_ENFORCEMENT" : true,
"SPORK_9_MASTERNODE_BUDGET_ENFORCEMENT" : true,
"SPORK_10_MASTERNODE_PAY_UPDATED_NODES" : true,
"SPORK_11_RESET_BUDGET" : true,
"SPORK_12_RECONSIDER_BLOCKS" : true,
"SPORK_13_ENABLE_SUPERBLOCKS" : true
}
Click to expand...

Super! Now time to light the touch paper,stand well back and watch the show :grin:
 
eduffield said:
They require 6-block level confirmations. Was the previous input sent via IX?
Click to expand...
I used the faucet to get tDASH and after 7 confirmations, i tried send 10 tDASH back to faucet.
This is old test wallet, if that matters.
 
AjM no idea, have to look through code and maybe try that myself...

@ everyone: ooops, I broke mixing on v12 not so long ago, pls update v12 testnet MNs once new build is ready. Sorry about that :oops:
 
UdjinM6 said:
AjM no idea, have to look through code and maybe try that myself...

@ everyone: ooops, I broke mixing on v12 not so long ago, pls update v12 testnet MNs once new build is ready. Sorry about that :oops:
Click to expand...
I can give to you that wallet if needed, its time before recent v11 manoeuvre, because of that i lost all my v12 tDASH from it.
 
AjM said:
I used the faucet to get tDASH and after 7 confirmations, i tried send 10 tDASH back to faucet.
This is old test wallet, if that matters.
Click to expand...
I just tested this, it works for me when the tx from the faucet got 6 confirms.
But it's a failed IX:

Status: 0/confirmed (InstantX verification in progress - 0 of 10 signatures ), has not been successfully broadcast yet
Date: 8/3/2015 13:07
To: test y25ZaK1REpw7t2BpDbKwN55fo941TqcDpV
Debit: -100.00000000 tDASH
Transaction fee: -0.01000000 tDASH
Net amount: -100.01000000 tDASH
Transaction ID: 0020bffd0bc9b599036e6352ca8f3091d631d330b0be93600f9dca6
 
moli said:
I just tested this, it works for me when the tx from the faucet got 6 confirms.
Click to expand...
Good, i think it is my wallet, v12 testing then v11 testing and back to v12 testing.
I am going to test totally fresh and wiped all clean with new ver. exe and new wallet.
 
UdjinM6 said:
AjM no idea, have to look through code and maybe try that myself...

@ everyone: ooops, I broke mixing on v12 not so long ago, pls update v12 testnet MNs once new build is ready. Sorry about that :oops:
Click to expand...
I hope you broke it, not in code, but by finding a flaw???
 
I got another testnet wallet that started on V11 and went to V12, that I used for testing (but didn't roll back)
I deleted everything apart from the wallet and now it refuses to sync even from block =1 at the start,
have tried all the repair options, nothing works and it sees no peers,

2015-08-03 17:12:00 ERROR: ContextualCheckBlockHeader : forked chain older than last checkpoint (height 1)
2015-08-03 17:12:00 ERROR: ProcessNewBlock : AcceptBlock FAILED
2015-08-03 17:12:00 Misbehaving: 37.157.253.66:19999 (0 -> 100) BAN THRESHOLD EXCEEDED
2015-08-03 17:14:34 socket recv error An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. (10054)
2015-08-03 17:15:38 socket recv error An existing connection was forcibly closed by the remote host. (10054)
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top