The Three Myths Used By Ultra-Wealthy To Justify Ultra-Wealthy
- Thread starter vazaki3
- Start date
What is this socialist garbage? The title says "three myths" and then goes on to list five things:
- systemic inequalities
- Ah yes, we must perpetuate the ridiculous notion of Robin Hood, stealing from the rich to give to the poor. Not least that governments interfere with natural flow to create and license oligopolies. The lazy mind says it's easier to control and collect tax from a few mega corporations than a truly decentralized and free market.
- Ah yes, we must perpetuate the ridiculous notion of Robin Hood, stealing from the rich to give to the poor. Not least that governments interfere with natural flow to create and license oligopolies. The lazy mind says it's easier to control and collect tax from a few mega corporations than a truly decentralized and free market.
- inherited wealth
- Families work hard all their lives only to have the government impose "inheritance tax". Yeah, it's easy for the tax office to do zero actual work while thieving from dead souls.
- Families work hard all their lives only to have the government impose "inheritance tax". Yeah, it's easy for the tax office to do zero actual work while thieving from dead souls.
- labor exploitation
- Let me guess, a fake economy built on "minimum wage". The lost costs of hiring more staff and expand business operations in your own local community. The response is to go offshore to Chinese sweatshops and dependence on cheap imports.
- Let me guess, a fake economy built on "minimum wage". The lost costs of hiring more staff and expand business operations in your own local community. The response is to go offshore to Chinese sweatshops and dependence on cheap imports.
- tax loopholes
- It's a global market, we are entitled to live and work wherever we choose. Dash is the offshore dream that elite politicians enjoyed for hundreds of years.
- It's a global market, we are entitled to live and work wherever we choose. Dash is the offshore dream that elite politicians enjoyed for hundreds of years.
- government subsidies
- For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction. The more government interference, the more deformed the result. The idea that stealing from Peter to pay Paul has no equal consequence. The consequences are always there, even if somewhat hidden to the lazy eye.
vazaki3
Well-known member
- What you dont understand is that all the wealth of the rich depends on the protection that the government offers, which protection costs a lot of money that is paid through the taxes. The rich want the protection of the government, the protection of the trade routes, but they dont want to pay the huge taxes for this protection.Thats not fair.
- Furthermore wealth should not be inherited. Wealth belongs to the community, not to persons, because the community defines wealth through the invention and the acceptance of a specific money object and also the community protects the wealth through the taxes given to the government that are used to finance the security forces and the juridical system. So we may incentivize persons who are capable to create wealth for themselves and for the community, but their heirs should also prove they are cabable to handle the created wealth. Otherwise incabable heirs do not deserve to handle/manipulate the wealth created by their ancestors.
Last edited:
The wishes of individuals to build wealth while doing no harm to others is somehow not fair? I'm not into this BS socialism.
Government, or any other structure that knowingly schemes and plays politics with individual lives is evil. These entities demand you make compromises "for the better good". Gradually stripping you of all your rights, your individualism, your identity. They are Trojan Horses.