In the meantime, the reaction from the PIVX community seems very positive.
Whoever is a PIVX masternode, he may vote in a similar proposal that was submitted there: https://forum.pivx.org/t/adaptive-proposalfee/1098
You can check how many votes the PIVX proposal received there:
and compare them to the votes the DASH proposal received here:
That way you can judge (and compare) the prudence of the DASH community leaders (aka the MNOs, or the whales ) and of the PIVX community leaders.
The 400 negative votes from the PIVX Masternodes were probably all hosted in @coin-server which is now down. (reference: https://forum.pivx.org/t/cdg-mno-approval/910/4 ). The initial 400 negative votes are not valid at the moment. Currently the Adaptive-ProposalFee proposal at PIVX is voted as follows:
Current Number of Masternodes: 1189 (unique IPs: 1189, IPv6: 377, TOR: 409)
Proposal 12: Adaptive-ProposalFee Yes: 35 / No: 28
Command: pivx-cli mnbudget vote ed56d683274c95a75a3ab169332d799310305388bf44888adec799058f2fdfa3 yes | no
@demo if one person controls 400 nodes, out of 1200, the situation is not recoverable. I am sorry.