You can't stop and idea whose time has come.
Do you want to read all of those proposals each month? I mean, ALL of them.. When they become numbered in the 100s and then in the 1000s, potentially. Even the long-and-boring ones, which are probably written by the best people for the job?
7) "Your proposal seems highly centralized. A master evaluator to rule them all." Yip-yip Demo, but do you have a better idea?
You can increase the number of those who can vote. That way you can decide thousands of proposals. Given enough eyeballs, all proposals residing in the proposal tree can be evaluated-voted.
And not per month! The month finalization of a proposal is a wrong idea. Proposals should always stay in the appropriate branch of the tree and wait to reach a threshold, in order to be able to be funded in the next budget cycle.
The idea is that everybody can post his ideas in the specific place of the tree, but the ideas do not expire every month. They are always there, classified in the correct branch of the interdependent polls tree, and wait until they reach the decided (by the voters) threshold (of the required number of votes). If they reach the threshold then the best of them can be funded by the allocated budged . So the voters are not in a hurry. Neither those who propose the ideas are in a hurry, they have plenty of time to advertise themselves and convince the voters that the decision tree should evolve to this or to that direction.
Hi Benglian,please post any queries/suggestion re the pre-proposal on it's thread where everyone can see it. We want & need feedback from the community, Curious to see what bothers you....
I was reading the proposal from https://www.dash.org/forum/threads/pre-proposal-business-integration-into-retail-sector.14808/ and as I am a Payments professional within e-Commerce (I am the Head of Payments at an iGaming platform) I note a lot of gaps in their proposal actually being achieved. Maybe these are in place and just not elaborated on, or maybe not.....?
Oh yes - Still on track: Busy with Phase 1 and hope to start evaluations with 2 evaluators on 7 June (new superblock) and hopefully have the 1st short list out early July in time for voting....
Though maybe I should read threads more avidly as it seems some work has already been done on this at https://www.dropbox.com/s/3girz7m4evocgw3/Proposal Evaluation Committee.docx?dl=0 .
Is this still alive?
And maybe there are DASH enthusiasts out there who could offer expertise and actually perform proposals but don't know what, where or how?.. Is there room for a section with maybe 'Suggested Proposal Areas' where some 'experts' (that word again) would suggest that 'Area X' has a need for someone to tackle it, outline what is needed, and ask for proposals in that area? Effectively being able to somewhat guide a proposal roadmap, especially for people who want to help and might have something to offer but lack direction?...
Hi Syntheist... As an outline idea DAOs covering each of the following areas could be established
Core Development Team
Hi Benglian,please post any queries/suggestion re the pre-proposal on it's thread where everyone can see it. We want & need feedback from the community, Curious to see what bothers you.
I will in fact do this. Why not. If we (well, you) are proposing that some experts vet proposals then let me do this one, since its within my knowledge frame, and will give the rest of the DASH community a taste of what might be achieved by an objective summary.
A small summary, that I will not post on their proposal thread, because this is a value opinion rather than an objective summary;...
... $10k for an integration is insane in this environment.
This is money down the drain whichever way you look at it.....
There is the easiest way，Directly marked on the post of the funded proposal，Unfinished annotation is in progress,Completed the markup for success，So that for unfinished projects, because of the special markings, will be node operators concerned about the progress of the project, and not because of the increase in the project caused by dazzling situation.
Nice idea! The Evaluator Report will have a section dealing with the Originators credibility, but a simple Badge will save reading
That would be ideal - haven't seen it done yet, but hopefully it will be possible @tungfa do you know if it can be done?I think the Evaluator report should be a sticky in the first post under the proposal....