• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

Dash price at the end of 2024, Dec 31

Dash price at the end of 2024, Dec 31

  • 10 - 19 USD

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • 20 - 29 USD

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • 30 - 39 USD

    Votes: 3 27.3%
  • 40 - 49 USD

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • 50 - 99 USD

    Votes: 2 18.2%
  • 100 - 149 USD

    Votes: 1 9.1%
  • 150 - 199 USD

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • 200 - 499 USD

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • > 500 USD

    Votes: 1 9.1%

  • Total voters
    11
  • This poll will close: .
Why not public? The wanna be prophets should be exposed.

And "This poll will close: Dec 14, 2024."

So delete it, and repost it.
 
Voter privacy gives more confidence to tell the truth. Voter transparency discourages truth.

OTOH, admins here know everything.

Yes, closes more than two weeks before the end of the year. Don't want people claiming accuracy just because they voted the night before.
 
If on-chain transactions increase above 20,000 daily, the hashrate rate rises by 50%, and BTC exceeds $70,000, Dash could be around $40.

If we maintain 10,000 daily transactions, the hash at these levels or less, and BTC drops to 50,000 or less, Dash will possibly be around $15.

all the best
 
If on-chain transactions increase above 20,000 daily, the hashrate rate rises by 50%, and BTC exceeds $70,000, Dash could be around $40.

If we maintain 10,000 daily transactions, the hash at these levels or less, and BTC drops to 50,000 or less, Dash will possibly be around $15.

all the best

Conditional vote! Thats the future of voting! Congratulations Dans for your insight!

Suppose someone proposes we go for a walk in the forest.
A stupid person votes yes.
Another stupid person votes no.
Another person votes "other", but "other" is not taken into account because it is unspecified.
The smart person votes: If it is raining, then no, else yes.
This is exactly what the core team prohibits, by only allowing us to vote either a yes or a no. They deny us the right to be smart. Conditional vote can be implemented in a computer enviroment. A computer programm checks the condition, and according to the condition extracts the appropriate vote and publishes the result of the poll.
 
If on-chain transactions increase above 20,000 daily, the hashrate rate rises by 50%, and BTC exceeds $70,000, Dash could be around $40.

If we maintain 10,000 daily transactions, the hash at these levels or less, and BTC drops to 50,000 or less, Dash will possibly be around $15.

all the best

See @GrandMasterDash ?

You dont let us change our vote in your poll, so how the conditional vote of @Dans can be implemented?

Thats why the voters should have the right to change their vote in the polls. Change their vote under certain conditions, that may or may not be declared to the poll owner.

Of course if the voter openly declares his conditions, he keeps them (this can be proved if the poll owner keeps the vote history) and predicts succesfully, this voter becomes more credible and his vote could be trusted in the future.
 
Last edited:
@vazaki3, you are a perceptive person, and I assume very intelligent, therefore, you will not be understood by most people.

Surely 80% of those who read you do not understand your perspectives, or your proposals, because you consider that people have your intellectual capacity, and unfortunately this is not the case.


People look for ghettos where they applaud each other, where they say nice things and their egos are consolidated, ghettos like Discord, where if someone says what they think and is right, but is not liked, they will be expelled immediately.


As you already know, democracy is absurd, just like communism, or capitalism itself... the government should be a changing entity based on its achievements and failures, and this should happen in real time, and not several years later.


Here, in Dash's democracy, the same thing happens... people vote, and vote again, and continue voting even knowing that they are being deceived, because they consider that voting otherwise could have negative repercussions on a project.


If I vote, for example, yes, to DCG funding, if and only if, a certain amount of code is delivered on a specific date, my vote will be effective.

If I vote yes, regardless of whether DCG delivers that code or not, my vote is garbage.


Now imagine that I finance a person who puts videos on the internet to advertise Dash... if these videos reach, for example, 100,000 views, the financing is carried out, otherwise not.


It's that simple... if you do your job well, you receive your reward, otherwise, you must improve to get your reward.


If we give a prize without demanding anything in return, this deteriorates our long-term financing system.

Greetings and health.

Surely now a clown will appear to vote for a laughing face because he has no solid arguments to debate anything, don't worry, there is always a jester in every kingdom.
 
Last edited:
@vazaki3 This is not a decision vote, it is a prediction of a future event, a game. In this game, I say be careful what you choose, you do not get to change your mind if the outcome looks like it's not going your way.

Create your own game and let the contestants plays yours too!
 
@vazaki3 This is not a decision vote, it is a prediction of a future event, a game. In this game, I say be careful what you choose, you do not get to change your mind if the outcome looks like it's not going your way.

Create your own game and let the contestants plays yours too!

"Dash price at the end of 2024, Dec 31".

This is not a question, it is also ambiguous. Do you mean the price we wish, or the price we predict?

I assumed it is the price we wish , so I voted >500 !!!

:p:ROFLMAO::p:ROFLMAO:
 
At the moment the price remains very weighed down. The supply of new coins that comes to the market slows down a possible increase in price.
We have seen a small rise in the capitalization list, and Dash has risen ten places in a few weeks.

The number of daily transactions remains very static moving between 9000 and 11500 per day.

At the moment all the hype generated around the platform has not been transformed into an increase in capitalization or an increase in transactions, so either this changes in the coming weeks or something that I mentioned at the time, but that I do not want to remember will become clear. moment.



I just ask all nodes to do the calculation of the capital contributed to plattform since it was evolution, and later we will analyze what has been achieved.

Greetings and health.
 
Last edited:
It has been 20 days since the last post in this thread and as we can see, there has been no FOMO of any kind in Dash after launching the platform on the market.

Not only that, but in 20 days we have gone from position 190 in coingecko to position 220 right now.... Nice lees 30 positions

BTC remains firmly held on to $60,000, and most coins continue its trend. except Dash, which not only does not rise, but has barely bounced from $22 to $24 these weeks due to the merits of BTC and not because of anything new that has been contributed from DCG.

You still haven't understood anything about how the capital markets work. No one will ever buy or invest in something that proves not to serve as a store of value.

Of course, apart from losing the initial investment, we have the problem that we pay high commissions for using Dash in the exchange to $, and if this were not enough, we continue giving away the budget to finance stupidities of all kinds that is more than demonstrated with the Dash price trend, which have served nothing more than for its creators to spend money without providing anything of value. Keep it up and you will soon be able to see $10 when BTC drops from 100,000 to 80,000

I'm still in the boat hoping that the budget finally doesn't reach DCG and finally disappears to allow dash to recover one day and be able to serve more than just giving up its value in exchange for nothing productive.

Greetings and health.
 
Someone must of listened to me, dash.org has a new website, though not a word of web3.

Thankfully, dash has someone assigned to Growth haha ;)

I do wonder, long term, how sustainable Platform nodes will be.
 
Someone must of listened to me, dash.org has a new website, though not a word of web3.

Thankfully, dash has someone assigned to Growth haha ;)

I do wonder, long term, how sustainable Platform nodes will be.
It would be interesting to know the minimum threshold by which it is profitable to keep a node running, in this case an EVO node.

For example, Crowdnode complains that prices are not enough to cover the operation of its platform and they choose to raise rates. Let's now think using the case of Crowdnode that the price of dash is set at $12, something distant, but very possible in the medium term given the trend and performance.

The rates that this platform would charge based on the current ones would be around 50 or 60% of the returns of each node, which would make it completely unattractive to maintain this investment.

It would have been lost twice, on the one hand due to the loss of capitalization of Dash, and on the other, due to the drop in yields.

This could cause a cascade effect if Dash loses the $19 zone, causing nodes that are no longer profitable to come onto the Dash market. As this factor causes the return rates of the nodes to increase, I assume that it would stop around the aforementioned $12 area, which could be the balance point of short and profit of maintaining a node with hardly any profit.

It will not be because you have not been warned of what is going to happen. Take note if you want, and if not, continue voting without thinking about the consequences.
 
Genuine question, how does Solana do it because I thought their node requirements were crazy?
Solana serves some VERY powerfull tokens, like Helium

Look at how many Helium nodes exist!

 
Back
Top