With regards to decentralization and network robustness : having multiple masternodes on the same physical server through the use of additional rented IP addresses and with multiple blockchain storage locations is currently already being utilized by MNO's through normal VPS service providers. There is even a solution for normal masternodes with additional IP addresses to share their blockchain storage.Seems backwards to have multiple evonodes on the same physical server from a standpoint of decentralization and network robustness. Shouldn't we be encouraging the opposite behavior? Spread them far and wide. If a particular datacenter goes down, we don't want it to create a shock to the network.
To Sam, for Q & A later on : can we have your feedback on pshenmic proposal on dash.org/forum to enable DAPI on Evonodes operating on Mainnet, before the official release of Dash Platform on Mainnet ?
This is what everyone else appearently saw :This would also allow DCG to release the Dashpay wallet a lot earlier then currently scheduled.
This would also allow DCG to release the Dashpay wallet a lot earlier then currently scheduled.
Thats the biggest problem , and nobody cares about it!!!Due to deliberate errors in the code, developers can destroy this project. I don't like the idea of any kind of update. Because there is a risk of the same fate as terra luna.