I really like this idea. Also, 10 Dash seems like a good point of entry.
What this needs to be viable is a user-friendly integration into the wallet, so people can stake inside a mobile wallet for example.
Also, I would propose that the "unit" of staking be 10 Dash, so you can only stake in...
Carry over no.
I would be for a flexible system, but I think it would be only fair if that would dip into the MNO rewards, not rewards of miners (and/of stakers, if we implement that).
As MNOs are effectively the ones with the power to vote on it and other network participants have no agency in...
We could just lower the mining reward, keep MNO rewards and budget the same, and burn the rest. That would effectively raise the value of all Dash in circulation, impacting holders.
Of course, that's just until we can implement some smarter long term solution.
$0.01 is a significant fee in places like Venezuela. If our network can be spammed that easily, then maybe we need to scale better.
I don't think we should be able to decide a minimum fee. Shouldn't current network congestion be a deciding factor?
Hm... I didn't get that from the previous response. It never states that Evolution is a prerequisite for InstantSend in mobile wallets, just that ChainLocks and Chained InstantSend are.
So that would mean there is no technical limitation to implementing PrivateSend into current mobile wallets...
Well, partially.
I have seen that answer before, but I actually wanted to find out if we'll have to wait for DashPay before we get PrivateSend on mobile wallets, or can we have it integrated before full Evolution rollout?
Ryan himself said that they are not related to each other and that you...
I have two questions:
Q1: When can we expect PrivateSend to be available on mobile wallets?
Q2: Is anyone currently looking into some sort of protocol level implementation of trustless masternode collateral sharing or is it an abandoned idea and it's left to trusted third parties to implement...
I think we should start talking about this again, because quantum computing threat may be closer than we think, considering that quantum computing power is increasing exponentially, not linearly as traditional computing power does...
I think this is far too vague.
I'm sure that we all want to improve the funding model if possible, but without a concrete improvement proposal, I don't see a point to this.
That's because most of the people that got into crypto early actually believe that basic income is a bad thing and should be avoided, as it inevitably leads to inflation.
That being said, I would like to see at least one crypto that does basic income, but does it right. I still don't see how we...
My initial reaction is that I don't like either one, but then I realized that it just may be that I'm too used to the old logo.
I'll have to give it some time and try to look at it more objectively.