PRE: Radio+1. Second round funding proposal.

Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA

Hello friends! Hello colleagues! Always welcome DASH community!

For those who don’t know us, let's get acquainted! We are "Radio +1", the first cryptoradio in the world.
If officially:

"Radio +1" is the first multimedia project about crypto-economics with round-the-clock broadcasting radio.
We live on the Internet, and we can be heard on the following resources:

http://plusoneradio.com
http://plusoneradio.ru
http://plus1radio.ru
Live ether chat in Telegram: t.me/plus1radio
Live ether phone: +7 (965) 777-30-33
Link to the information stream: http://live.plusoneradio.info/Plus1radio
Link to the music stream: http://plus1radio.ru:8000/airtime_128_mp3
You will be informed about launching our accounts in social networks in the nearest future.

Every day, a team of professional journalists creates a tool for effective work of entrepreneurs and specialized professionals in the areas of finance, technology, cryptocurrency and blockchain.

The new economy, its formation, principles of work, mutual influence on financial, political, social life in Russia and in the whole world are in the focus of the editorial attention. The operational news of crypto-economics and reviews of important world events every half a hour are available for listeners, as well as conversational and analytical programs.

"Radio+1": A new generation of information!
The launch of the Russian-language broadcast is the first step in project development. In the coming months, it is planned to launch an English-language radio and a website. Further the project will be scaled by franchise to Chinese, German, French, Portuguese, and Spanish.

Preliminary agreements on partnership with profile information projects have already been reached and agreements are being formalized.

Tired of the information flow? No problems! By pressing one button the listener can change the information stream to a musical one and evaluate the author's selection of music outside the framework of musical styles and formats.

Our achievements and plans can be found in our current report.
Reports on the progress of our project are being implemented at dashwatch.org are published every last week of the month.

Radio+1 is legally registered at Plus One Media Group LLC in accordance with the legislation of the Russian Federation and is being registered with Roskomnadzor as official media.

The project was implemented with the support of the DASH community, and its launch was funded from the DASH treasury. The progress reports on the implementation of our project, on DashWatch.

Our pre-proposal discussion at Dash forum.
Discussion for previous budget proposal, which has passed voting.

Our first funding proposal at DashCentral
SUPPORT US BY YOUR VOTES

Also our proposal was discussed in Russian, Spanish, German, English forums at Dash Forum, in Telegram App, Reddit, BitcoinTalk forum and Discord App (DashNation server).

Radio+1 fans are launched an independent discussion of our project at BitcoinTalk:

Mass-media about us:
Interview on rucrypto.com
Release on cryptonomica.info
Release on Financial and Investments forum mmgp.ru
Release on Financial forum BizChat
Post about us on Cryptocurrencies.RF
Release on Cryptocurrencies.RF

Our broadcasts are available at:
BitradIO - informational channel, live ether
BitradIO - our music channel
RadioGarden - informational channel, live ether

Start of the video stream of our broadcasting is planned in the nearest future, as well as the broadcast of our air in a separate channel in cable and smart TV.

How we planned this project:


How the project has been launched:


Our news is published on the radio every 30 minutes, as well as published on our website, Russian DASH forums, and on golos.io

The news line is formed from primary sources (speeches of speakers, websites and tweets of projects and their organizers) and the best world media. Each news is rechecked, and analyzed by the editorial staff, and also discussed live with authoritative experts. For the first month of work, the editorial staff of the radio station generated about 500 news items.

Our experts are well-known personalities, cryptoprojects organizers, specialists, software developers, investors, traders, analysts, government officials - officials, State Duma deputies and regional parliamentarians, organizers and representatives of educational, information projects, exhibitions and conferences, as well as industry specialists - science, education, Federal Tax system, and others.

Standing speakers and experts are also active members of the DASH community. There are 5 to 20 invited speaker-experts every day on the air of the radio. Further formation of the expert pool is under way. In addition to experts, our radio listeners constantly chatting with presenters. Interactive communication with them is realized in the our live ether Telegram chat, and via cell phone which gives an opportunity to call to presenters and give a comment to some themes on air. The inclusion of radio listeners in live broadcast occurs daily several times a day.

In addition to the news content, Radio+1 releases the morning, afternoon and evening talk shows on the current agenda, as well as author programs and podcasts:

"Blockchain Academy" - the head of the academy Kirill Mikhailov talks about existing and promising blockchain projects.

"Koursach" - leading on personal experience, presenters talk about different master classes and other educational projects they have tested;

"Coaching by the rules and without" - the course of the famous business coach Ilya Rudnik on the practice of coaching in real business, and on real examples.

"Psychology on the practice" - leads the popular psychologist Yulia Krasikova

"Crypto Astrology" - entertainment show from the famous astrologer and psychoanalyst Alina Kuzmichuk;

In the near future, this list will be supplemented by programs authors in themes of economics, trading, ICO-projects, and legal issues of regulation in crypto-economics.

The most interesting programs are repeated on different time bands for the most convenient perception of listeners in different time zones around the world (we are covering 64 countries for now).

The information coverage of our project already exceeds hundreds of thousands of people. Part of the audience has already become our regular listeners. Detailed statistics about our audience can be disclosed in official sources only after the registration of Radio+1 as official media (we are already applied for a license).

In addition, we become informational and strategic partners, talk about them, and they about us, increasing the involvement of people, and we exchange unique news content, that also increases trafic to our website. Among them are all Russian DASH-resources, as well as general cryptoportals, conferences, start-ups, periodicals, scientific, educational and entertaining publications, exhibitions and digital conferences and successful business. This is our systematic and constant work.

One of the main tasks is to become the official media of the DASH project, and to create a media holding with the participation of DAO DASH. Our proposals are formalized and sent to Dash Core General Manager, Mr. Ryan Taylor.

PROJECT DEVELOPMENT

To continue our work, we appeal to the DASH community for new funding.

On April 1, we jokingly asked for 5999 DASH.
In the description, we talked about a joke and, most importantly - about a very good idea, which we want to offer you a separate proposal. Please read the attached description. The real price of our budget proposal is 150 DASH per month for half a year.


For understanding, read our explanation:
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1w6VNXN67Kgx9Kai56_9uQk7qDXYKPD3K5CyJYN3iGwE

We believe in you, and ask the God not to lose faith in DASH, and people who have MNO votes!
We wish you every success, health, and growth of Dash.

Your first cryptoradio in the world!

Who cares about our project, if our project to you is not indifferent we will be happy for your help!

Donate us: XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
 
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
Why was your proposal defunded last month?
Your question also Excites us.
We consider this to be an illogical and unjust decision. We have our own research on this, and the conclusion is very disappointing.
Inside the community, there is a lobby that votes against other proposals to promote its own. Now we are analyzing the financing from the treasury through the analysis of large databases, and see the corruption that is emerging in the community. In other words, it is impossible to explain the appearance of more than 200 votes against us for 1.5 hours without a single comment and explanation of the reasons. I hope that those who did this, realize the consequences of their actions, and correct their mistakes.
Now the consequences of these people's decisions are catastrophic for the employees of our radio. We left our previous work to do a real honest cryptoradio in the interests of DASH. We made a high-quality and professional product, we believed in digital cash, and during the implementation we did not receive any critical comments. We just got not without any explanation what does not seem fair to us. If we are wrong, criticize us reasonably, we are ready for an honest conversation that should make us and the community better.
I apologize for possible errors in the text. Translation is done automatically. I can not afford to address my editors with such problems, and disappoint them with unreasonable, in my opinion, community decisions.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Kirill
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
Why was your proposal defunded last month?

We draw the attention of the community to the fact that a group of owners of the master class on 30.03.2018 in the period from 18.00 to 21.00 UTC held a mass vote against not only our proposal, but also on many other proposals. At the same time, in all the proposals against which votes were cast, there was not a single well-reasoned commentary of the people who voted against.
Please see the evidence from your monitoring system:
https://dashvotetracker.com/
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kirill

Argon31

Member
Mar 10, 2018
214
54
88
37
Do you think this was because you didnt perform to expectations or were people just trying to make space for higher priority proposals like Ben Swann?
 
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
Your question also Excites us.
We consider this to be an illogical and unjust decision. We have our own research on this, and the conclusion is very disappointing.
Inside the community, there is a lobby that votes against other proposals to promote its own. Now we are analyzing the financing from the treasury through the analysis of large databases, and see the corruption that is emerging in the community. In other words, it is impossible to explain the appearance of more than 200 votes against us for 1.5 hours without a single comment and explanation of the reasons. I hope that those who did this, realize the consequences of their actions, and correct their mistakes.
Otherwise, our journalists will have to publish the data obtained during the analysis in open sources, which can damage the reputation and development of DASH.
Now the consequences of these people's decisions are catastrophic for the employees of our radio. We left our previous work to do a real honest cryptoradio in the interests of DASH. We made a high-quality and professional product, we believed in digital cash, and during the implementation we did not receive any critical comments. We just got not without any explanation what does not seem fair to us. If we are wrong, criticize us reasonably, we are ready for an honest conversation that should make us and the community better.
I apologize for possible errors in the text. Translation is done automatically. I can not afford to address my editors with such problems, and disappoint them with unreasonable, in my opinion, community decisions.
Voices "against" appeared simultaneously and massively on many proposals. We have listed only a few examples.
The current budget has been cleared of applicants for almost 1000 DASH. The only proposal against which no vote was cast at that time was Ben Swann's proposal:
https://www.dashcentral.org/p/Renewal-Ben-Swann-Reality-Check
Before the mass negative vote began, his proposal was uncompetitive, and 486 votes against it were argued. The main complaints against him, left in the comments remain:
1. Unreasonably large budget spent on its own business, which does not bring tangible benefits to the community.
2. Lack of reporting for previously obtained from the treasury 2400 DASH
3. Lack of mandatory escrow and much more.

In this case, we do not blame Ben - he is a bright person, with a well-deserved reputation and charisma. We will be glad to communicate, and possible cooperation with such a wonderful person.

More questions arise to the people who promote it, and to the ways that they apply. Voting against all without analyzing the benefits, perspectives, stages of each project, and their competitive proposals, destroy people's belief in the fairness of the DASH budget system.

Now the time has come when there are more good offers for the treasury than money. And, this should develop a civilized internal competition of proposals.

What the supporters of Ben made by their vote disappoints the people who give their time, power and money to the promotion of DASH. This can be a serious charge from competitors DASH, and ill-wishers, in imaginary decentralization and manipulation within Digital Cash.
 
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
[QUOTE = "Argon31, post: 179291, member: 24295"] Как вы думаете, это было из-за того, что вы не оправдали ожиданий или просто пытались сделать пространство для предложений с более высоким приоритетом, таких как Бен Сванн? [/ QUOTE]

b6bb6c42-0375-47db-94b3-e3c24e1320b3.jpg
 

Argon31

Member
Mar 10, 2018
214
54
88
37
I have sympathy for how this was voted down to make room for huge proposals without any payback.

Ben Swann needs to be given 800 Dash again, Feedbands needs another 1000 plus dash core, so I am not sure if there will be much room left in the next 3 months.
There are going to be many proposals for the remaining few dash.

However you will have my vote when you decide to take a chance again with 5 dash, starting all over again.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kirill
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
[QUOTE = "Argon31, post: 179295, участник: 24295"] Я сочувствую тому, как это было проголосовано, чтобы освободить место для огромных предложений без окупаемости.

Бен Сванну нужно дать 800 Dash снова, Feedbands нуждается еще в 1000 плюшевых ядро, поэтому я не уверен, что в ближайшие 3 месяца останется много места.
На оставшиеся тире будет много предложений.

Однако у вас будет мой голос, когда вы решите снова принять шанс с 5 тире, начиная снова и снова. [/ QUOTE]

Thank you very much, Argon!
I'm glad that there are people in the DAO DASH who believe in the declared principles of openness and decentralization, and are not afraid to defend their positions in an open dialogue. Without people like you, there will be no justice in the world.
We really appreciate your opinion and voice, despite the fact that now this participation seems very problematic. In the current situation, salary obligations for our team come first, and to find 5 DASH even in such a low rate as it is now seems problematic. The payment for the next offer was also planned for so-expected money from the treasury.
Despite such a sad development of events, we believe in the idea of DASH, and we will do everything to make DASH better.
Although we are accused of blackmail. We will prove that there are no provocations in our actions. We decided what to do next.
In addition to obligations to the community, each employee has the honor, and remains a true journalist. Therefore, we will not wait, and hope for other solutions. We will talk, and write people the truth. And this should make DASH better. Either DASH will ruin itself.
You are now heavier. You believed in Digital Cash, invested in this project your money, believing in justice and decentralizacion. But just people like you make our world free! Thank you for honesty, support and justice! Our radio is always open for you!
 
  • Like
Reactions: Argon31 and Kirill

Kirill

New Member
Apr 2, 2018
5
4
3
34
в то время как люди, однажды с успехом, теперь используют свою инерцию для обогащения, другие реальные идеи и проекты не могут получить поддержку! Такие люди являются злокачественной опухолью первого в мире децентрализованного сообщества, которое заболело еще ребенком ((Можно ли спасти этого ребенка? Или эти метастазы в эту болезнь убьют его? Это грязное дело человека и его придворный пакет Он достоин своего статуса знаменитого создателя? И, возможно, под этой маской успешного создателя лежит реальный ДЭВЛ разрушения? Как объяснить этот поступок по-другому? Я не знаю! Мировая система создала гнилость власти и неравенства, боль и страдания, которые она всегда приносит, где она появляется. Децентрализация в какой-то момент казалась единственным реальным шансом на перемены, но есть гнилые и жадные люди ... И те, кто слаб по духу, становятся их слугами. Они ходят в свите, как Волан Де Морт с троглодитами в Мордоре, отравляя жизнь и процветание вокруг них. И, как показывает история, мир объединяется, все объединяются, которые вдыхают свободную, чистую и разрушают, вырезают гребанную гнилую опухоль. Так было всегда, так будет на этот раз ... yeap man Sw @ nn вы будете наказаны, и как вы будете сожалеть, что не можете себе представить ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alexey Danilin

Orion

Member
Aug 21, 2017
135
38
78
32
You can take a look at the Masternodes that voted against you on Dash Ninja.
I have looked through 100 that voted against you between March 26 and 30. Almost none of them voted on the Ben Swann Proposal at all. Only 10 of those 100 voted for him and 2 voted against him. I had no time to look through the other 100 but I don't expect it to be much different.
So I don't think that the two occurences were related.
Of course I don't understand either why your proposal was defunded because I always thought you're doing a great job and there was also enough Dash in the treasury for you. But I think the defunding had nothing to do with Ben Swann.
You can compare the voting hashes of the two proposals here:
https://www.dashninja.pl/proposalde...6ae9dba3d6d4ac355d38306f8cf3fd6f5b4e3e592ebf0
https://www.dashninja.pl/proposalde...df5be537602912915fa7c07f427e12edacf21bfb09785
 

Kirill

New Member
Apr 2, 2018
5
4
3
34
You can take a look at the Masternodes that voted against you on Dash Ninja.

Hi man!
you know it's too long to check all the votes and i exactly don't need it, becouse there are a lot of enother indicates of his implication to this case...
Thank's for spending a time to our branch
good luck and all best wishes to you ;)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Alexey Danilin

Argon31

Member
Mar 10, 2018
214
54
88
37
[QUOTE = "Argon31, post: 179295, участник: 24295"] Я сочувствую тому, как это было проголосовано, чтобы освободить место для огромных предложений без окупаемости.

Бен Сванну нужно дать 800 Dash снова, Feedbands нуждается еще в 1000 плюшевых ядро, поэтому я не уверен, что в ближайшие 3 месяца останется много места.
На оставшиеся тире будет много предложений.

Однако у вас будет мой голос, когда вы решите снова принять шанс с 5 тире, начиная снова и снова. [/ QUOTE]

Thank you very much, Argon!
I'm glad that there are people in the DAO DASH who believe in the declared principles of openness and decentralization, and are not afraid to defend their positions in an open dialogue. Without people like you, there will be no justice in the world.
We really appreciate your opinion and voice, despite the fact that now this participation seems very problematic. In the current situation, salary obligations for our team come first, and to find 5 DASH even in such a low rate as it is now seems problematic. The payment for the next offer was also planned for so-expected money from the treasury.
Despite such a sad development of events, we believe in the idea of DASH, and we will do everything to make DASH better.
Although we are accused of blackmail. We will prove that there are no provocations in our actions. We decided what to do next.
In addition to obligations to the community, each employee has the honor, and remains a true journalist. Therefore, we will not wait, and hope for other solutions. We will talk, and write people the truth. And this should make DASH better. Either DASH will ruin itself.
You are now heavier. You believed in Digital Cash, invested in this project your money, believing in justice and decentralizacion. But just people like you make our world free! Thank you for honesty, support and justice! Our radio is always open for you!

Ben Swann has submitted cooked up and fudged figures on @DashWatchTeam and no one has questioned them on it.

He has claimed at one place that the amount he has received is 1.5Million dollars( a lie ) where on @DashWatchTeam , this amount shown to be only $800,000 for 1600 dash.

So which one is it? Both cant be true.

He claimed to be paying $2500 for hosting and now that figure includes salary of person and other expenses when questioned. *ahem*

The kind of complicated accounts he has submitted are proof of the kind of accounting fraud and misreporting that is going on. @DashWatchTeam remains a mute spectator and is unlikely to ruffle feathers by asking him for real transactions, where the whole story will unravel and ben will have to tell further lies about why transactions are unavailable.

I would have advised you to submit fake cooked up figures in protest and tell anyone who asks you for an escrow to get lost; but I dont think that will end well for you because you arent ben swann.

Anyhow you have my support.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Kirill

DashWatchTeam

New Member
Dec 5, 2017
27
33
13
40
Ben Swann has submitted cooked up and fudged figures on @DashWatchTeam and no one has questioned them on it.

He has claimed at one place that the amount he has received is 1.5Million dollars( a lie ) where on @DashWatchTeam , this amount shown to be only $800,000 for 1600 dash.

So which one is it? Both cant be true.

He claimed to be paying $2500 for hosting and now that figure includes salary of person and other expenses when questioned. *ahem*

The kind of complicated accounts he has submitted are proof of the kind of accounting fraud and misreporting that is going on. @DashWatchTeam remains a mute spectator and is unlikely to ruffle feathers by asking him for real transactions, where the whole story will unravel and ben will have to tell further lies about why transactions are unavailable.

I would have advised you to submit fake cooked up figures in protest and tell anyone who asks you for an escrow to get lost; but I dont think that will end well for you because you arent ben swann.

Anyhow you have my support.
Hi Argon31, we're still working with the Ben Swann proposal to get a clearer sense of their funding expenses. We had a call with him last week regarding some questions we had, if you had any particular questions you'd like to ask we are happy to follow up the best we can with the proposal owner. Admittedly, it has been difficult to get some funding information from the proposal owner.

Please note that we try to be an objective reporting force in the Dash community. We are neither for or against any particular proposal, our only alliance is to the Dash community. We are also just in the beginning phases of our reporting so right now we do not have the authority to get information from proposal owners, we hope that this will change in time. We have been discussing a more audit side of the Dash Watch team, which will be more aggressive into diving into financials and deliverable's and trying to unravel exactly how each and every funding dollar has been spent. However, this is still in the planning/developmental phase. Please bare with us for now as we are trying our best with our team and working to build better communication channels with both the Dash community and with proposal owners.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Argon31

Argon31

Member
Mar 10, 2018
214
54
88
37
@DashWatchTeam

I would like Ben Swann's figures to be audited properly as it quite clear that cooked up accounts have been given.
I have never seen millions of dollars accounted in the manner I see on Dashwatch currently.

Ofcourse you have the authority to ask questions if there are issues with misreporting.

You should ask him to provide receipts for transactions he claims to have made and blockchain transactions along with timestamps.
Having worked in audit before, I can tell you that you will receive heavy push back on transparency because this is a case of accounting fraud.

The web hosting cost clarification issued is a complete joke. A narration/clarification like that would have raised a large red flag.

The whole proposal has gone up to nearly 5600 dash, so this isnt a small amount anymore.
The entire point of dash watch is to ensure proposal owners don't get away with fraud like this.

In the meanwhile, you should communicate to the dash community the problems you are facing in getting information out of Swann.
He is still due to receive many payments and will be forced to comply if you approach the community with facts.

Argon31
 

DashWatchTeam

New Member
Dec 5, 2017
27
33
13
40
@DashWatchTeam

I would like Ben Swann's figures to be audited properly as it quite clear that cooked up accounts have been given.
I have never seen millions of dollars accounted in the manner I see on Dashwatch currently.

Ofcourse you have the authority to ask questions if there are issues with misreporting.

You should ask him to provide receipts for transactions he claims to have made and blockchain transactions along with timestamps.
Having worked in audit before, I can tell you that you will receive heavy push back on transparency because this is a case of accounting fraud.

The web hosting cost clarification issued is a complete joke. A narration/clarification like that would have raised a large red flag.

The whole proposal has gone up to nearly 5600 dash, so this isnt a small amount anymore.
The entire point of dash watch is to ensure proposal owners don't get away with fraud like this.

In the meanwhile, you should communicate to the dash community the problems you are facing in getting information out of Swann.
He is still due to receive many payments and will be forced to comply if you approach the community with facts.

Argon31
Hi, thank you for the feedback. We've been very hesitant to put any proposals "on blast" because of 2 reasons: 1. We want to give all proposal owners a fair chance in telling their side of the story, and 2. We're still a relatively new proposal ourselves and we're still working on developing and improving our systems.

The current numbers and information we have do not totally account for all the Dash that has been funded to the Ben Swann proposal. We're not the ones to draw any type of fraud accusations at this point in time. However, we are trying to put together the complete picture in terms of funding expenses and the proposal owner has been cooperative thus far.

We can all agree that the treasury system desperately needs more accountability, but we're also trying not to rush into any type of accusations or conclusions without solid evidence. In our experience, many of the proposals that aren't meeting milestones or delivering are not due to malicious behavior. Most are simply due to inexperience and/or mismanagement of the proposal by proposal owner(s). Also, to clarify on our earlier authority comment - we (Dash Watch) cannot force or demand any type of information from proposal owners. They are not obligated to give any information at all. However, we hope that the community eventually gives enough weight to Dash Watch reports that it will help push proposal owners to comply with Dash Watch.


If you would like to keep up to date with this, or any other proposals, please reach out to us either here or on the Dash-watch channel on the Dash nation server. We're most likely to respond quicker on the Dash-watch channel.
 
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
Colleagues! Thank you for the detailed discussion in the branch of our proposal. Your opinion on our project is very important to us, but, unfortunately, we are talking more about the budget system of DASH than about the meaning and usefulness of our application.
I want to sum up this dialogue: In our opinion, all the talk does not come to any positive result. Voting on our proposal has not changed, and we see a little intelligible argument for voting for or against our project.
It is sad.
In community dialogues, the issue of the utility of budget proposals is always discussed. There are more and more opinions that investments in permanent projects should be monetized in the interests of the community. The example of our proposal, and the fact of his unjustified exclusion from the budget on the last day of voting by a mass negative vote make a bad advertisement to our community.
It will frighten off the cooperation of professional, ideological enthusiasts. This complicates the development of really interesting long-term structural projects, and without them we will not be able to develop more effectively. I can not imagine that a really interesting proposal, requiring continued and serious work, will want to work with DASH. You have to be crazy to work for a company, to do quality work, knowing that the day before your salary, you will be closed by a day without any explanation. Our project is a vivid example of such "cooperation".
In ordinary life, this behavior is called fraud or deception, but everything is simple for us: "So anonymous masters decided." This is not correct, and requires changes.
But still. This is our new budget proposal. And, we will be happy to know your opinion exactly in the framework of our work.
We want this proposal, as a minimum, to sum up the results of our work. For us, this is life, work, and reputation. And, we do it honestly. And, we do not want it now, or then there were accusations that everything we did was in vain. We fulfilled what you promised. We offered development according to plan, and even better. And, we are waiting for your honest answer.
 

demo

Well-known Member
Apr 23, 2016
3,114
263
153
Dash Address
XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
You can take a look at the Masternodes that voted against you on Dash Ninja.
I have looked through 100 that voted against you between March 26 and 30. Almost none of them voted on the Ben Swann Proposal at all. Only 10 of those 100 voted for him and 2 voted against him. I had no time to look through the other 100 but I don't expect it to be much different.
So I don't think that the two occurences were related.
Look at the mnowatch project.

https://demodun.github.io/mnowatch/the_results_dashd_01-04-2018.html

put "Fintech" in the NO filter, check the "Hide NOVOTE column" , and then CTRL+F in your browser in order search for "Renewal-Ben"
Press enter continuously and count how many occurencies you will find. It is not 10, it is 132!!!!!!

How is it posiible to make such a big mistake in counting?
 
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA

demo

Well-known Member
Apr 23, 2016
3,114
263
153
Dash Address
XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
Demo! Thank you for your research!
You are welcome! :)

It is not 132. It is 138 actually, and you can discover it here if you search (by using CTRL+F) for "Renewal-Ben" in your browser, after filtering for "Fintech" the NO votes and hiding all the table columns except the YES column (in order for all the votes to be fully displayed and searchable).

Alternatively, for more accurate results, you may use a curl -s command similar to this.
 
Last edited:

demo

Well-known Member
Apr 23, 2016
3,114
263
153
Dash Address
XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
And here you are the whole table (in raw data and sorted by votehash) of all those who voted NO in your proposal.

https://pastebin.com/raw/HfjQ0d4s

My original idea was to post similar tables to every proposal thread, but my effort was censored in the forum by the moderators. Thats why the mnowatch project ended to reside in offtopic, as a compromise between me and the mods.
 

Orion

Member
Aug 21, 2017
135
38
78
32
You're right @demo, I should have used your site. It's very helpful. But I was also right with my data but my assumption was wrong. I looked at 100 Masternodes on Dash Ninja that voted NO between March 26 and 31 and only 10 of them voted for Ben Swann. So I only looked at half of the 203 Masternodes that voted between those dates. But the second half contained a huge voting block that voted against the Fintech Radio and also for Ben Swann. And because me not seeing this voting block led me to assume lower numbers.

However my point still stands that most of the Masternodes that voted NO between March 26 and 31 did not vote for Ben Swann. I only found around 90 (I hope that number is right and I did not overlook some Masternodes) that voted during this time period and also voted for Ben Swann. The other Masternodes that voted against this radio and also voted for Ben Swann voted against the radio in January.

edit: And of course both proposals could have been funded. Therefore I'm not convinced that people voted against this because of the Ben Swann proposal.

edit: And of course I wish you good luck with your next proposal because I haven't heard anything bad about this team. :)
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Alexey Danilin

demo

Well-known Member
Apr 23, 2016
3,114
263
153
Dash Address
XnpT2YQaYpyh7F9twM6EtDMn1TCDCEEgNX
You're right @demo, I should have used your site. It's very helpful. But I was also right with my data but my assumption was wrong. I looked at 100 Masternodes on Dash Ninja that voted NO between March 26 and 31 and only 10 of them voted for Ben Swann. So I only looked at half of the 203 Masternodes that voted between those dates. But the second half contained a huge voting block that voted against the Fintech Radio and also for Ben Swann. And because me not seeing this voting block led me to assume lower numbers.

However my point still stands that most of the Masternodes that voted NO between March 26 and 31 did not vote for Ben Swann. I only found around 90 (I hope that number is right and I did not overlook some Masternodes) that voted during this time period and also voted for Ben Swann. The other Masternodes that voted against this radio and also voted for Ben Swann voted against the radio in January.
The original plan of mnowatch project was to run the script several times a day, and keep an accurate history of the votes.
Thats how your undocumented claims could be proven (or rejected).
Unfortunately I am unable to cover the cost of hosting such a site, and of course there is not a single MNO who wants to fund this.
Almost nobody is motivated by the truth, almost everyone is motivated by their own profit and benefit...
 
Last edited:
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
You're right @demo, I should have used your site. It's very helpful. But I was also right with my data but my assumption was wrong. I looked at 100 Masternodes on Dash Ninja that voted NO between March 26 and 31 and only 10 of them voted for Ben Swann. So I only looked at half of the 203 Masternodes that voted between those dates. But the second half contained a huge voting block that voted against the Fintech Radio and also for Ben Swann. And because me not seeing this voting block led me to assume lower numbers.

However my point still stands that most of the Masternodes that voted NO between March 26 and 31 did not vote for Ben Swann. I only found around 90 (I hope that number is right and I did not overlook some Masternodes) that voted during this time period and also voted for Ben Swann. The other Masternodes that voted against this radio and also voted for Ben Swann voted against the radio in January.

edit: And of course both proposals could have been funded. Therefore I'm not convinced that people voted against this because of the Ben Swann proposal.

edit: And of course I wish you good luck with your next proposal because I haven't heard anything bad about this team. :)
Orion! Thank you for evaluating our work!
We launched the radio 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, in the Russian-speaking market with an estimated audience of 150 million people in just 35 DASH per month, speaking of DASH daily. We coped with the fall of the DASH rate by 4 times and spent all our money to earn a reputation, and to develop further by going to foreign markets and talking to them in the native languages of listeners. This unique product works, which is very important against the background of blocking information about cryptography on all major Internet resources and dreamed of improving and developing. Now it's scary to dream, so every evaluation is important for us
 
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
Friends! Colleagues! Community!

The March period of the distribution of the budget of the treasury was completed. Without us...

We thank the whole community and 725 votes for our project before the distribution of funds! We saw that the fight lasted until the last second, and in the last hour before the distribution of funds we received another confirmation that there are bright forces in DASH, and honest, just people! Voices for us were added until the last second before the distribution of the budget. Now we have 729 votes. Let our page remain a monument of the struggle for justice in the community! Vote, who is "FOR". Now this is nothing for the treasury and reflects only your mood and honesty:

https://www.dashcentral.org/p/FinTech-online-radio-R1

We did not have 21 votes before the automatic approval of the application. The lobby of the masternodes, who does not play fair, did not change his decisions, sat in the bushes and refused one of his cowardly voices. Coward, because they never had the courage to even explain their negative decisions.
Thank you all for your support and trust! It remains a conviction that true decentralization, democracy, common sense and normal commercial calculations will be able to defeat the existing lobbying of interests!
 
Dec 29, 2017
107
26
78
40
Saint-Petersburg
plusoneradio.com
Dash Address
XhK4ETtKxc8CuCudMsQFPjoKT2B9oZUMRA
You - who voted against us - you did not make a good gift to your protege ..
A notable example of our defeat was the remarkable DASH speaker Ben Swann, an American opposition journalist who uncovers conspiracies and lies in his programs. Now imagine, what mistake did you share with him? Fighting for the truth, link money and get huge funding to the detriment of other projects and leave money without money, your families, your children?
There can be more than one American media that wants a sensation in their budget proposal. If this happens, then for DASH this will not be a victory.
But we are for Ben, we are for his project.For the future lesson, playing now, think not only about coins, but also about the consequences of the price being provided to them, prices for everyone.
And we want Ben's success, and in case of problems, we cordially invite Ben Swan to Russia. And, we say - such a studio that he wants to build, you can buy in Russia less than half a million dollars with incomes and fame. And, for his budget, there is an FM radio for sale with a coverage of 10 million people. Here is the whole example.
We wrote this to you, and Mr. Taylor in the course. And our proposal was, in contrast to Mr. Swanna, in creating a media holding in cooperation, in shares with DAO DASH, which we informed everyone, and you. Here is our proposed escrow. And this is our approach to work together, not against, not at the expense of DASH.
 
Last edited: