Now that the price of Dash tripled in USD, some proposals that have been voted 3 months ago will get 3 times more the price they asked!!! And if the Dash price falls, some job proposals that are asking today for a specific amount of DASH will get nothing. Is that fair? Lets see how this can be solved. Apart from this alternative budget system, there is also yet another alternative budget system (initially posted here) that differs tottaly to the one the community currently uses . how much do you pay for someone to do a job ? This should be a subject to vote, using numbers. You may vote inbetween 0 dash, and the whole (or remaining) monthly budget (of course if someone allocates all his number vote to one proposal, there is no room for him to vote for another proposal, in the same budget cycle). Then the system calculates the mean average of all votes in order to specify the final amount the community gives, to the one who will manage to accomplish the job. And of course everyone may change his number vote whenever he/she wishes, so the system is tottaly flexible to both the expected quality of the job and the USD/DASH price fluctuations. As you may have observed the above is a tottaly new budget system and a totally new way to deal with money allocations in the budget. There is the current budget system where someone proposes a budget allocation and receives yes/no votes for it, and there is this totally different budget system where someone proposes to the community a job that is able to accomplish, and people give him amounts of money (by using the number voting capability) they think he deserves for this job. This alternative budget system may be used on top of the basic yes/no approval. The yes/no initial approval is essential in order to avoid troll proposals that are asking the whole budget and beeing voted by few MNOs in order to get the small fee that occurs as a result of the mean average of all numerical votes. So only in case a proposal passes the yes/no vote, will enter into this alternative budget system. Alternatively in order to avoid trolls and in case you dont want to use the initial yes/no vote, instead of using the mean average, you can use the mode average or the median average to calculate the result (and additionaly set a minimum participation in the vote, this minimum may also be valid for the yes/no vote too). Or another alternative way is to say that each vote counts as: "amount= 2 X allocated_budget/number_of_masternodes" and everyone who votes for a proposal should pay with his own wallet the half of the above amount. So the persons who want to troll the system, they are actually paying for voting, so they are unable to troll! This is a government question that will be added in the governance system if it gets support here, and if I manage to find the 5 dash proposal fee. And if it passes the governance system voting, an implementation proposal will follow. The government question: Would you like to be able to vote how much DASH you give for a budget proposal? P.S. This government question has been posted also here.