Even better, lets have MNs elect the foundation board. One MN, one vote.
It would be my view the DASH Foundation should remain a separate function from the DASH Master Node network/voting body.
My viewpoint, sans documentation, would be the Foundation is or should be a benevolent group interested in promotion of the DASH vision beyond financial gain.
The Master Nodes are certainly interested in financial gain, which is not an unreasonable concept !
IMO, Foundation participation should not be solely dependent upon MN vote, nor should membership in the foundation be restricted by some high monetary price.
IMO, ALL reference to USD & btc should be avoided in budgetary and appropriation discussion... the accountant can deal with fiat conversion when necessary.
I do NOT know how one actually becomes a member of the DASH Foundation, yet it occurs to me it could be accomplished by a white-paper letter of intent submitted for vote to the existing Foundation members, perhaps along with a gratuity, (or locked amount in wallet), submitted along with that proposal for membership, much as any proposal is submitted to the MNs for vote.
YMMV
rc