Welcome to the Dash Forum!

Please sign up to discuss the most innovative cryptocurrency!

Liquidity Providers original versus Liquidity Providers v2

Discussion in 'Pre + Budget Proposal Discussions' started by qwizzie, Apr 27, 2016.

  1. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    696
    Trophy Points:
    183
    [​IMG]

    Liquidity Providers Original

    https://www.dashwhale.org/p/ds-liquidity

    Liquidity Providers v2

    https://www.dashwhale.org/p/ds-liquidity-v2
    https://dashtalk.org/threads/proposal-ds-liquidity-providers-v2.8668/

    In 9 days the next superblock will be upon us and unfortunetely both budget proposals are currently still
    approved instead of one budget proposal replacing the other. This means that both budget proposals
    could still end up getting paid, which we really need to avoid as that was not the intention.

    Anyways i would like to urge everyone to vote in such way that in the end only one budget proposal remains, this means
    voting yes on one propsal and voting no on the other proposal.
     
    #1 qwizzie, Apr 27, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 27, 2016
  2. Jeztah

    Jeztah Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2014
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    145
    Trophy Points:
    103
    What about reimbursement? Before you lobby to take away something the LPs were promised and consequently never received, please consider pushing for reimbursement.

    https://www.dashwhale.org/p/LP-reimbursment
     
  3. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    696
    Trophy Points:
    183
    I'm not lobbying to take something away here, i'm trying to prevent both budget proposals passing on very weak support as one is clearly presented as a
    replacement for the other.

    Personally i'm more for the original proposal then for the v2 as the original proposal had some decent support (15%) before v2 suddenly popped up.
    I decided to give v2 the benefit of the doubt before voting on it but unfortunetely time is running out now and people do need to make a choice which
    proposal to suppport and which proposal to down vote.. Hopefully from these two a proposal emerges that can survive the coming three months and maybe longer...

    With regards to reimbursement, thats different in this case in my view as the original proposal lost a few battles with other competing budget proposals while struggling to keep above the 10% treshold. End-result was that it missed a few payments before settling back to 15% support. That can happen and is part of the budget system.
    There will be a constant battle between budget proposals / projects that could lead to some budget proposals / projects getting only partial funding.
     
    #3 qwizzie, Apr 27, 2016
    Last edited by a moderator: Apr 27, 2016
  4. Jeztah

    Jeztah Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 9, 2014
    Messages:
    181
    Likes Received:
    145
    Trophy Points:
    103
    I just didn't want that proposal to be overlooked by the masses. I'm certainly not agreeing on both either.
     
  5. tungfa

    tungfa Administrator
    Dash Core Team Foundation Member Masternode Owner/Operator Moderator

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2014
    Messages:
    8,881
    Likes Received:
    6,707
    Trophy Points:
    1,283
    I am all for this proposal but think we should stick to the plan
    1 proposal , promote for that and done

    if it gets down voted , do more promotion in the next round

    posting new proposals for old ideas (and then down voting the old once) is just a pain und unnessacery voting (pain)
     
    • Like Like x 1
  6. qwizzie

    qwizzie Well-known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 6, 2014
    Messages:
    1,426
    Likes Received:
    696
    Trophy Points:
    183
    yeah, i agree with that.
     

Share This Page