• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

Cryptsy Under Federal Investagation (MAYBE)

MrZilch

Member
Source Link.
http://coinfire.io/2015/10/04/federal-investigations-of-cryptsy-underway/


The online exchange is under several investigations with multiple agencies including the Securities and Exchange Commission, the Internal Revenue Service, and the Criminal Investigation Division of the Internal Revenue Service, among others.

Documents from various investigations obtained by Coin Fire show a litany of purported wrongdoing by the company and several team members. The large number of allegations levied against the company varies from agency to agency in more than 300 pages of documents. In some instances, the investigation alleges that the company failed to obtain appropriate licenses. In one particular instance, a connection is made between a Cryptsy team member and GAW Miners’ fraudulent operations. Other government agencies report a failure to report gains appropriately, market manipulation, the sale of unlicensed securities, money laundering, and more.

The document cache obtained by Coin Fire contains materials ranging from the Securities and Exchange Commission to the Department of Homeland Security. The earliest records in the cache against Crypsty contain minor investigations of wrong-doing and are dated prior to the larger investigation of Mr. Homero Joshua Garza and Mr. Carlos Garza; however, the information discovered during the GAW Miners investigation caused lead investigators from multiple organizations to begin scrutinizing Crypsty and its parent company, Project Investors, more closely. The investigation against Cryptsy intensified after a “PayCoin controller” was exchanged to the company and the two investigations began to run concurrently.

In one document, FinCen began to examine allegedly illegal transactions where money was being moved to accounts connected to suspected terrorists, but the investigation had since stalled. This document was set aside and ignored for several months until recent information indicated potential transactions with suspected terrorists. Later documents referenced this earlier FinCen document, with the most recent alleging that both Project Investors and Cryptsy were aware of an account on their platform being used by an individual with ties to banking watch lists and restrictions.

The documents also explore other allegations. In one report, an organization alleges that the company utilized automated trading software on a platform that directly benefitted Crypsty staff members. The report also alleges that a key Cryptsy staff member performed fraudulent transactions related to the movement of PayCoin by Mr. Garza.

Another document shows one organization beginning a probe of PayCoin’s blockchain history. This document alleges that Cryptsy was being used by Mr. Garza to disguise money movement for both him and his associates. Furthermore, the report claims that the company was aware of this movement and not merely complicit; this allegation is echoed by material within the document indicating that (1) staff member engaged in these fraudulent transactions and transfers, and directly engaged in market manipulation.

A wide variety of federal agencies have taken an interest in cryptocurrency companies over the last year, with many preparing for administrative actions and even criminal charges in early 2016. These agencies have been seen cooperating on several levels. One agent with the Securities and Exchange Commission told Coin Fire that they were,

Looking at the worst offenders in cryptocurrency and would be closing in further on our unofficial “top ten” list of which Cryptsy and Project Investors will find itself to be in the Top 5.

memo321-crp.png


Additional draft documents allege that the fraudulent transactions and direct market manipulation have been ongoing for an extended period of time. One agency stated to prosecutors that “[we have] undeniable proof of direct market manipulation by the company.” This draft document to prosecutors references an attachment containing information as to how that conclusion was obtained, but was not made available to Coin Fire at this time.

allegmemo212cryp.png


Other claims from FinCen center on the issue of failing to obtain licenses on a state-by-state basis. Although state governments are tasked with the enforcement of state-level licenses, FinCen clearly outlines Crypsty’s failure to obtain said licenses. This failure was used as additional evidence that the company has engaged willfully in violations of the law. An internal memorandum amongst FinCen staff later included this information and recommended that the company’s “licensing issues” should be discussed with various states.

justifcationmemo442.png


The documents from FinCen contain several screenshots of Cryptsy staff members on a popular bitcoin-related forum making claims about the validity of licenses, which were then verified by the agency on six separate occasions. Cryptsy later denied the posts publicly, but the various social media posts within the document attachments were certified as authentic by various federal computer forensics teams.

FinCen also makes statements regarding transactions that an organization claims were criminal in nature.

launderlines4-5.png


One organization began working with information from the Department of Homeland Security, and initiated an investigation of bank transfers to several banking institutions via sealed subpoenas. The records allege that the company platform was used in money transfers to accounts linked with suspected terrorists. The document further alleges that Cryptsy had been used as a means of money laundering for some time, and that the company was aware of this activity and allowed it to continue.

fincenline83.png


It appears from the reports that investigators will begin seeking formal subpoenas. These subpoenas are believed to be delivered in 2016, and will likely request a wide range of information including transaction history, server information, and consumer account information.

In the interim, one federal organization’s sealed subpoena revealed information that they found “interesting” according to one memorandum and would be used as part of an action against several members of the Project Investors team.
 
we have enough exchanges
only problem is all volume is on the top 3 and the rest is empty !!
 
exactly, a lot of coins is out of amrket, people prefer to get MN earnings and does not keep the coins on exchanges.
I use poloniex and dashcurex, at this second there is almost no liquidity. ASK side ok, BID not enough....
 
Response from Cryptsy:
RE: Coinfire
I feel I need to give a response to the recent Coinfire article. Like their previous article, they’ve make a lot of claims without giving any kind of proof to their claims. I know many people don’t take coinfire very seriously these days, which is good. However there are some out there that may not really know that the kind of “News” these guys produce is not always reliable.

We have never been investigated for anything, period. We have never gotten any letters from any of the agencies that they have stated in their article, nor have we been contacted via phone or any other method. It’s safe to say that this article and their reporting are completely false. My guess is that whomever wrote this article has personal reasons for writing it and are attempting to hurt our business and reputation.

We will be reviewing our legal options against this libelous article.


Paul Vernon

“BigVern”
 
Hate the exchanges anyway, they take away all the good that crypto is meant to offer...

- near-flat fee structure? - forget it, AFAIK they all work on percentages
- anonymous and decentralized? - nope, licencing and lots of excuses for AML / KYC

Basically, the moment you want to interact with fiat is where it all goes wrong. Best build our own economy; figure out ways to get dash into people's hands and circulating.
 
Only one source, very strongly worded, immediately responded to by Big Vern...I wonder if there's any accuracy here or if Vern isn't correct and it's an attempt to libel them.
 
I'm still waiting for a BTC withdraw from them since Monday morning. The TX listed is invalid/rejected yet all they can say since then is they're looking into it.

Annoying to have to pay miners our of my pocket but I always do as it's not their fault.

BitCoin18LfaB87PwHCp8VGPtxHh3AGgeW1DVk75U0.69058378 BTCYes2015-10-05 07:50:08
ProcessedTrxID: e6de775b0afc81bca324675b639fa58eb50dcd50681c8285eb7665e08708f4e5 @ 2015-10-05 07:55:53

Retweet if you can,

https://twitter.com/_xpool_/status/651336736652558336

Maybe they'll eventually refund it but stuff like this they hope just gets forgotten about after they continue to say we're looking at it... looking at it... looking at it.
 
I'm still waiting for a BTC withdraw from them since Monday morning. The TX listed is invalid/rejected yet all they can say since then is they're looking into it.

Annoying to have to pay miners our of my pocket but I always do as it's not their fault.

BitCoin18LfaB87PwHCp8VGPtxHh3AGgeW1DVk75U0.69058378 BTCYes2015-10-05 07:50:08
ProcessedTrxID: e6de775b0afc81bca324675b639fa58eb50dcd50681c8285eb7665e08708f4e5 @ 2015-10-05 07:55:53

Retweet if you can,

https://twitter.com/_xpool_/status/651336736652558336

Maybe they'll eventually refund it but stuff like this they hope just gets forgotten about after they continue to say we're looking at it... looking at it... looking at it.

I'm going on 24 hours wait for withdrawl of Dash. Transaction is listed as pending in Cryptsy. Still holding out hope.
 
I'm going on 24 hours wait for withdrawl of Dash. Transaction is listed as pending in Cryptsy. Still holding out hope.

How much are you waiting on withdrawing? Just curious :).

Pablo.
 
As a nice little side note: I just tried logging into Cryptsy. It gives me error code 878 and refuses to let me log in.

Pablo.
 
Back
Top