I have updated this pre-proposal with a couple of working examples.
Please be more specific what you mean with 'final count'For each proposal, if a masternode has not voted in this or previous cycles (Yes, No or Abstain), it will not be included in the final count.
Actually, am about to substantially change the concept. Stay tuned.Please be more specific what you mean with 'final count'
I am starting to get the feeling that you want a masternode ip address that did not vote in a voting cycle, get temporary removed as registered masternode without impacting its rewards. So that the 10% threshold gets a little lower as the proposal system then counts less registered masternodes.
I am not sure that is technically even possible or even desirable.
I think you should post about this in Ryan's upcoming discussion about changing our proposal system (once he fully worked the details). I know Ryan wants to extend the proposal system to 20%, we already have details about that. But he also mentioned he wanted to investigate ways to increase voting participation and streamline the whole proposal system. That discussion did not take place as no details emerged about it yet (as far as i know). This topic could fall under that.