It is not free stuff.
As long as it remains a simple quote without any proof provided, it can also be considered as a speculation that is presented as fact.
"extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence" , as people use to say.
He presents his conclusion without any proof! How is it possible this to be accepted by a rational individual?
I do not belong to the flat-earth society, I always expect the proves nearby the claims.
You do not describe at all the way you did your investigation.
You said "I examined the claims and I discovered this" but not a single hint on how you did that.
I assume you expect us to believe you because you carry the "Dash Core Group" badge. Right?