Search results

Please view the September Cycle Report

A new cycle has been launched based on the terms in the last proposal. Sadly we were forced to launch later than we would have liked, this won't be the case in future cycles. A report for the September cycle will be released very soon. Start Date: October 15st, 2018 End Date: October 31st...

Hey @camosoul, I really appreciate you looking into this, it's been a good conversation to read through. A little about myself, I am as close to what one might call an active PrivateSend "researcher" and enthusiast and I have discovered many things worth improving and that have been improved...

DashBoost July Cycle Report

If you want to 'fire' us then put in the proposal. If you want to tell us to allow governance proposals in DashBoost, put in a proposal to the MNs. The people have the power to mandate a change if they see fit.

Yes, if you want to change something, suggest it to the team. We can debate its merit and come to a decision, if you disagree with the decision then you can put it to a MN vote.

Well now, either you read my comment too hastily or you are attempting to put words in my mouth. I did not state that "all the Dashboost internal governance decisions should depend on the MN network." Instead I stated "any attempt to mandate a change must be approved by the MN network." In other...

The one dash fee is what was agreed to by the MN network, in addition, I see no instance where a fee lower than $250 is beneficial for legitimate projects which are large enough to deserve funding. Any project which cannot crowdfund a one dash fee is clearly not good enough anyway to be of any...

I highly disagree, if someone cannot afford, or find someone to sponsor, a one dash fee then it is clear the project is not a good one anyway. This fee is a necessary anti-spam feature in order to protect the platform. Governance proposals will not be added, as DashBoost is not a mechanism...

@Saul Felipe Cano Quiñones We will do what we can to have a cycle in July, and I believe we will be able to. However, I am not in a position to be able to make promises.

The first substantial DashBoost cycle is finally wrapped up. Please view the cycle report

We are looking into it, but since the treasury is so tight, we are unsure how it would go.

We will do everything we can do get another cycle up as soon as possible. But if we will have the funds to, I do not yet know.

Thanks for the feedback! I've shared this with my team and I'll try to get on that soon to put new text in for it.

"1 Dash Proposal Submission fee" (https://www.dashcentral.org/p/gc-dash-boost). Since that is the statement which the MN network agreed to, we will follow by it unless community consensus is clearly shown.

Thanks! I'm glad you appreciate the service. We will continue to advertise it on Reddit and other mediums. Hopefully word gets around well.

Again, @demo, you seem to have quite flawed logic. 1. DashBoost has been clear from the start that the fee will be around one dash or lower, depending on the cycle. 2. This system was not designed for everyone to participate. It was designed to allow smaller budget proposals. DashBoost is not a...

@demo, Dash is open source. If you or anyone finds it such a priority you can either implement it yourself or pay someone to implement it, post it as a pull request, and see what the feedback is and if it gets merged.

@demo In the case of proposals which are as small as yours you have a few options: 1. Put up the proposal for a total of 2 dash (1 dash requested, 1 dash fee) 2. Find the funds by some other means. We have no plans to reduce the fee, or make it directly proportional to the amount requested in...