I see it more like this, pardon the total change of venue.
BitCoin surged to $1200. For no reason. It was noting but hype pump.
Who was there to fill in REAL support so it would stay there? The value was present. It was squandered.
It's not just moving the decimal point, but filling in REAL things like ADOPTION that keep it there. MN operators are vested in this in a key way that has never existed in crypto before.
So, that answers your question from the other end. MN operators will not be solely concerned with doing the math, but filling in the infrastructure by using value that is already there. They won't just want to, they'll be foaming at the mouth to do it! What good is it if your MN is worth a quarter million for a day, then goes back to nothing again? M operators will be voting yes on every project that expands the input potential. Like jumping in the air ad having someone pile 2 feet of dirt under you so you don't come back down. Do it again, and again...
Masternode owners are smart. They will either act to move the value of the currency or act to maintain the value (in the case of an artificial rise in valuation).
I have to admit that I accepted the proposal on face value when I first read it, but now I'm coming around to the arguments made by camosoul.