• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

Pre-Proposal: Would you like this proof of individuality to be implemented in Dash?

Would you like this proof of individuality to be implemented in Dash?


  • Total voters
    39
Mate, I'm trying to help you focus on what you want completed, you have to understand that simply knowing how to read and do simple maths clearly isnt enough to for people to get their heads around what you're proposing. I understand that youre smart, but when you become insulting it just turns people away from you, I understand you may not care, but you should understand that DAOs are about communication and this requires you to have a small degree of empathy for the people who you are communicating with and vice versa.

I really hope you find the time to complete this proposal and system such that it has a clear way for people to opt out of voting by the numbers, there needs to be a way to clearly spoil their vote and say, I dont want this in the system. Currently it seems to me that even no votes are a vote for some number, which means people will need to unlearn the official way of using the voting system.

If I'm wrong please dont insult me, just be patient and educate me, thanks :)
 
I really hope you find the time to complete this proposal and system such that it has a clear way for people to opt out of voting by the numbers, there needs to be a way to clearly spoil their vote and say, I dont want this in the system.
If you dont want a specific "vote the numbers" proposal to exist into the budget system, or even if you dont want anyone of them to exist, you could cast a delete signal vote on them (although I think that recently the demonical DCG banned that type of vote, thus enslaved even more the MNOS)

If you do want the "vote the numbers" proposals to exist into the budget system but you just dont want to see them appear in your screen due to their complexity, you could order a developer and she/he could code for you a filter system, and then you could filter all the proposals that end to _DigitX.

Finnaly , the system I propose is an add on, usefull whenever there is a demonical DCG that refuses since 8 years now to the MNOS the right to vote the numbers. Normally a DCG not possesed by daemons should have coded all that stuff in the very first place as a core functionality, and they should have allowed the MNOS to vote decimal numbers rather than the complex BASE3 numbers. The BASE3 system was invented as a resistance to the dictatorship of DCG, and the stupid DCG can do nothing to prevent a smart MNOs community to vote that way.

Currently it seems to me that even no votes are a vote for some number, which means people will need to unlearn the official way of using the voting system.

Yes, NO votes are numbers.

If you dont like a "vote the numbers" proposal at all, then just dont vote at all on it (neither NO, nor YES nor ABSTAIN).

The lack of participation will stop this proposal, because a "vote the numbers" proposal in order to be legitimate it has to pass a participation threshold (currently arbitralily set to 10%, although we could vote the numbers on that)
 
Last edited:
The participation reached 6.36% !!!

<EncointerUBI numerical proposal vote history>

Electorate = 3363 potential votes (Regular and Evo MNOs)
ValidVotes = 214
Voting participation = 6.36 %

---VOTING RESULTS (depends on which among the below election methods you prefer.)---
---Divisive Election Methods---
  • Most Voted Number = 0 (or 0000 base3) was voted by 50 votes ( 23.36 % of the valid votes )
---Inclusive Election Methods---
</EncointerUBI numerical proposal vote history>

Vote here, for the proposal to reach 10% participation!
 
Last edited:
We have many people that did not vote all the digits. These people can be indirectly traced if you watch the results as if it was a base4 vote.

Look here (note that the code is deprecated and does not support EVO nodes):

All the people who have at least one zero in their Base4 vote, have voted invalid for Base3.
We are talking for about 159 masternodes !!!!

PLEASE CAST A VALID BASE3 VOTE!

Vote here
 
First draft of a video tutorial on how to link your Encointer Wallet to the Dash wallet.

https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/27dda403-5d76-4cdd-a68c-0fa262122172

The next version will be better.
The idea of the video is, as an Encointer reputable you declare what your Dash address is, so you will receive your basic income on that Dash address.

That way all the Encointer reputables hold Dash addresses, they are members of the Dash community, and they may start transact eachother by using Dash.

Which means that DASH BECOMES THAT WAY A REAL MONEY, USED FROM REAL PERSONS, FOR REAL PURPOSES. Dash is no longer a stock market game, or an EVO credit manipulated by the government agents or by the daemon possessed DCG.
 
Last edited:
Let me expose now some of the names that currently vote not a single Dash to be given as Basic Income to the Encointer communities.

DIFoCrowincu
incuketimnow
DCGCincumnow12
qwizzie
moduRetaElec
DCGCketiincu
mnowincuketi
ketiketimnow
esmeralda

You may investigate more about them, here:



The above persons, if not government agents, they are obviously possessed by daemons.

Because they refuse to offer 1 Dash (that does not belong to them after all) as a basic income for the next month to Encointer, to 68 persons who each one may desperately need this 0.014 Dash to survive (especially the african ones).

May God have mercy on the possessed souls.




Vote for Encointer here, for the proposal to reach 10% participation!


Finally I am the last one in the dark
In the dark
 
Last edited:
Let me expose now some of the names that currently vote not a single Dash to be given as Basic Income to the Encointer communities.

DIFoCrowincu
incuketimnow
DCGCincumnow12

DCGCincumnow12 changed his/her mind, and no longer votes 0 Dash!

Well done DCGCincumnow12!
 
The below video will be published to the Encointer members in case the masternodes approve to give any amount from their budget to Encointer.

 
I created the official Dash/Encointer address. All funds will go there, then distributed to the Encointer reputables’ Dash addresses with the help of an mnowatch script. The address is XwQpmyskbKPuTYKFF2wEZZcxfY17npUCZk . Dash address XwQpmyskbKPuTYKFF2wEZZcxfY17npUCZk (cryptoid.info)

If you would like to support the Dash/Encointer communities, help them grow up and strengthen this proof of personhood service of the Dash community that opposes the government agents and the bots (which have almost devour both our community and Dash's price in marketcap) then feel free to tip the above address.

Also dont forget to vote for Encointer, for the Encointer proposal to reach 10% participation!
 
Last edited:
<vote history>

Selected BASE3 type proposals
Digit1: encointerUBI-Digit1 - Digit2: encointerUBI-Digit2 - Digit3: encointerUBI-Range-0-242-Digit3 - Digit4: encointerUBI-NewRange-0-80-Digit4 -

Report = the_results_dashd_2024-10-21-00-52-25.html.csv

Electorate = 3285 potential votes (Regular and Evo MNOs)
Valid Votes = 265
Valid Votes participation percentage = 8.06 %
Invalid Votes ( those who voted at least one digit but not all of them )= 197
Invalid Votes participation percentage = 5.99 %
Total Voting participation ( both valid and invalid votes ) = 14.05 %

---VOTING RESULTS (depends on which among the below election methods you prefer.)---

---Divisive Election Methods---
Most Voted Number = 0 (or 0000 base3) was voted by 130 votes ( 49.05 % of the valid votes )

---Inclusive Election Methods---
Median Average = 2 (or 0002 base3)
Mean Average = 22.22
Time Splitting rule = Not coded yet

Note: Multiply the number of your favorite election method by the appropriate Chunk ( =[maxRange-minRange]/granularityOfTheBase3Digits ) =1 , to discover the voting outcome.

</vote history>
 
Here follows the final text of the proposal:







The above video will be published to the Encointer members and will invite them to become Dash members, only in case the Dash masternodes approve to give any amount from their budget to Encointer.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

THE GOVERNANCE QUESTION: Regarding the numerical proposal "Encointer Basic Income", after achieving a voting participation greater than the arbitrarily chosen threshold of 10%, may I ask you: What election method would you like to be used in order to extract a result, for the snapshot of the month OCTOBER 2024?

OPTION 1) DO NOT ANSWER the above question at all (just ignore this governance question as if it was never published), in case you believe that the inquestioned number should not be voted but should be decided by an authority/god and please describe the authority/god in the comments below.
  • If this option is selected this will result the encointerUBI proposal to receive 0 Dash for the OCT24 month.
OPTION 2) VOTE No if you think that a divisive method based on the percentage 49% should be applied . You may claim that the most voted number (which is currently zero) should be selected, despite the fact that at the end of the October budget cycle it was selected by only 49% of the votes, while the majority 51% of the votes were against it and they wanted to give an amount more than zero to the Dash/Encointer project. The percentage threshold in order for this option to be considered rational depends on the "mostVotedNumber" field of the results, which at the end of the October budget cycle was decided to be the 49% of the valid votes. So the NO option is eligible only in case it is voted by more-equal than 49% of the votes. For example, it is not rational for someone to claim that 49% is the correct election method to be used, in case this method receives only 30% of the votes! In that case the method does not respect itself!
  • If this option is voted this will result the encointerUBI proposal to receive 0 Dash for the OCT24 month.
OPTION 4) VOTE Abstain if you like the "Mean average", the most inclusive method where ALL the votes are calculated into the final outcome. Also vote ABSTAIN if you are a proponent of the time splitting rule, where all numbers are considered as valid numbers in the appropriate time window (for example: in case 70% of the voters voted 0 and 30% of the voters voted 26, we create a time window less equal than the human life time, lets say 10 years, and for the first 7 years the 0 number is applied, then for the next 3 years the 26 number is applied). Also vote ABSTAIN if you are a proponent of an alternative method not mentioned as an option in this poll (including the request to increase or decreace the voting range from 0-80 to something else) and please describe your alternative poll option in the comments below.
  • If this option is voted this will result the encointerUBI proposal to receive 0 Dash for the OCT24 month, but a new budget Proposal will be created asking the masternodes to select among the mean average, the time splitting rule or whatever else is proposed in the comments, provided of course there is available Dash into the dash/encointer tip address in order to pay a proposal fee.
OPTION 3) VOTE Yes if you like the "Median average" (a method introduced by Pietro Speroni). Also vote YES if you think that the tyranny of the majority "50%+1" should be applied, because at the end of the October budget cycle the 50%+1 of the votes decided to give an amount more than zero to EncointerUBI. This method has been introduced in the ancient Athenian Direct Democracy and claims that it is fair 50%+1 of the votes to rule 50%-1 of the votes, for 100% of the time.


----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P.S.

  1. I recommend to the Dash members to bootstrap new local Encointer communities in their cities or to participate to any Encointer meeting worldwide, and thus examine the Encointer procedures and get the Basic Income (paid in the local currency and hopefully also in Dash). I also strongly recommend the masternodes to participate at least once in any local Encointer meeting, in order to receive the Dash basic income and find out that their vote is not in vain.
  2. PLEASE TIP THE DASH/ENCOINTER ADDRESS. Whatever you give as an individual to that address, it will be given as a Basic Income to the Dash/Encointer members (reputables) or used as proposal fee for budget proposals related to the Dash/Encointer project.
  3. FINNALY, PLEASE DONT FORGET TO ALWAYS PRAY AND ALWAYS VOTE FOR ENCOINTER numerical proposal, BECAUSE THE NUMERICAL VOTE LASTS 24 MONTHS. PLEASE VOTE HERE !!!!
 
Last edited:
The proposal for OCT24 is up and running. Please vote for it.



The Results of the vote:


<vote history>

Quick reference to Base3 voting theory: The semantic of this page is ( VOTED_NO=0, VOTED_ABSTAIN=1 and VOTED_YES=2 )


The Numerical Proposals (the base3 digits) and the report date

Selected BASE3 type proposals Digit1= ENCOINTER-SUPPLEMENTAL-OCT24
Report = the_results_dashd_2024-11-20-00-52-59.html.csv

Electorate = 3292 potential votes (Regular and Evo MNOs)
Valid Votes = 338
Valid Votes participation percentage = 10.26 %
Invalid Votes ( those who voted at least one digit but not all of them )= 0
Invalid Votes participation percentage = 0 %
Total Voting participation ( both valid and invalid votes ) = 10.26 %



---VOTING RESULTS (depends on which among the below election methods you prefer.)---

---Divisive Election Methods---

Most Voted Number = 2 (or 2 base3) was voted by 229 votes ( 67.75 % of the valid votes )

---Inclusive Election Methods---
Median Average = 2 (or 2 base3)
Mean Average = 1.41
Time Splitting rule = Not coded yet

Note: Multiply the number of your favorite election method by the appropriate Chunk ( =[maxRange-minRange]/granularityOfTheBase3Digits ) , to discover the voting outcome.
Note: This set of proposals does not declare a chunk in its last proposal/digit name



The Valid Votes (those who voted all the digits)

The Valid Votes (base3)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2

The Invalid Votes (those who voted at least one digit but not all of them)

The Invalid Votes (base3)
No Invalid Votes.



</vote history>
 
Last edited:
Back
Top