I have been around long enough to know that many projects fail in business they are not all successful. Learn from your mistakes and carry on....Masternodes should not have to pay this back. I would expect that Ira Miller pay back the funds if there has not been any work delivered to a high standard.
This is your argument.
My argument is make the masternodes pay for the fiasco, so that way the next time they will think to vote for bullshits, they will be more cautious.
Good luck getting this to happen...be realistic.....I think the lesson has been learned (well hopefully) by the masternode community.
I am realistic. 4253-1459=2794 masternodes lost from this case. And 1459 (those who voted yes) may (or may not) earned some profit. So if this community is a healthy one and not a fraud, then the rational thing is the majority of the masternodes to force the minority (who are responsible for this fiasco) to pay.Good luck getting this to happen...be realistic..
even if this proposal passed, i wonder how you will enfore those MN holder to pay ? most of those MN holder will just remove their MN and recreate MN using another address.
the only logical proposal would be asking those lamassu proposal submitter for refund.
Sell a guilty Masternode? And who is gonna buy it? And lets say there is someone who wants to buy a guilty Masternode, then our goal is accomplished! Everything is ok in case the guilty/stupid decides to sell his masternode, because in that case the stupid/guilty has no voting rights anymore, thus the community wins!i think u never heard of privatesend, meh... anyway those MN can just be sold and u got nothing.
Rewarded by who?i think the other alternative should award those who voted no... its a matter of carrot and stick, yin and yang. those who voted "no" has shown wisdom, they should be rewarded.
...the cost of enforcing it would far exceed the wasted dash in the first place, not to mention the time it would take to develop.
It isn't necessary. MNs already have a significant financial stake in the success of the network.
Do you honestly believe that those 1459 masternodes who voted "yes" want the success of the network? And even if they want the success of the network, do you really believe that with their stupid votes they can turn the network succesfull?
The network's profit is to get rid of the persons operating those 1459 masternodes.
Those 1459 may want their investment to go up, but do you honestly believe that they are also capable to make their investment to go up when they vote like that?I don't believe, I know, that people don't hold investments in things when they don't want the value of that investment to go up.
Those 1459 may want their investment to go up, but do you honestly believe that they are also capable to make their investment to go up when they vote like that?
And why all the rest masternode operators, the majority which voted "no" or abstained, to tolerate the stupidity of the persons operating those 1459 masternodes?
They should not tolerate them, they should punish them, using the power of the majority.
Abstaining means you are okay with the status quo. And if the proposal is funded, then abstaining means you don't care about defunding it