• Forum has been upgraded, all links, images, etc are as they were. Please see Official Announcements for more information

PRE-PROPOSAL: ENCOINTER-SUPPLEMENTAL-OCT24

vazaki3

Well-known member

The above video will be published to the Encointer members and will invite them to become Dash members, only in case the Dash masternodes approve to give any amount from their budget to Encointer.


GOVERNANCE QUESTION: What method would you like to be used in order to extract a result from the encointerUBI numerical proposal for the month OCTOBER 2024?

OPTION 1)
--DO NOT ANSWER-- the above question at all (just ignore this governance question as if it was never published), in case you believe that the inquestioned number should not be voted but should be decided by an authority/god and please describe the authority/god in the comments below.
  • If this option is selected this will result the encointerUBI proposal to receive 0 dash this month.
OPTION 2) --VOTE NO-- if you think that a divisive method based on the percentage 49% should be applied . You may claim that the most voted number (which is currently zero) should be selected despite the fact that is selected by only 49% of the votes, while the majority 51% of the votes are against it and they want to give an amount more than zero to the Dash/Encointer project. The percentage threshold in order for this to be considered rational depends on the "mostVotedNumber" field of the results, which currently is decided to be the 49% of the valid votes. So this NO is eligible if it is voted by more-equal than 49% of the votes. For example, it is not rational someone to claim that 49% is the correct method to be used in the case the method is voted and receives only 30%! In that case the method does not respect itself!
  • If this option is voted this will result the encointerUBI proposal to receive 0 dash this month.
OPTION 4) --VOTE ABSTAIN-- if you like the "Mean average", the most inclusive method where ALL the votes are calculated into the final outcome. Also vote ABSTAIN if you are a proponent of the time splitting rule, where all numbers are considered as valid numbers in the appropriate time window (for example: in case 70% of the voters voted 0 and 30% of the voters voted 26, we create a time window less equal than the human life time, lets say 10 years, and for the first 7 years the 0 number is applied, then for the next 3 years the 26 number is applied). Also vote ABSTAIN if you are a proponent of an alternative method not mentioned as an option in this poll (including the request to increase or decreace the voting range from 0-80 to something else) and please describe your alternative poll option in the comments below.
  • If this option is voted this will result the encointerUBI proposal to receive 0 dash this month, but a new budget Proposal will be created asking the masternodes to select among the mean average and the time splitting rule, provided of course there is available Dash into the dash/encointer tip address in order to pay a proposal fee.
OPTION 3) --VOTE YES-- if you like the "Median average" (a method introduced by Pietro Speroni). Also vote YES if you think that the tyranny of the majority "50%+1" should be applied, because currently 51% of the votes decide to give an amount more than zero to Encointer. This method has been introduced in the ancient Athenian Direct Democracy and claims that it is fair 50%+1 of the votes to rule 50%-1 of the votes, for 100% of the time.


P.S. The damned dashtalk forum admins (as expected, damnation resides everywhere here in Dash) banned the polls in this section, so in order for you to be able to VOTE you have to rate this comment as follows:

YES --> rate this post with a (y)
NO --> rate this post with a :mad:
ABSTAIN --> rate this post with a :ROFLMAO:

P.S.2 DONT FORGET TO TIP THE DASH/ENCOINTER ADDRESS. Whatever you give to that address, it will be given to the Dash/Encointer members or used as proposal fee for budget proposals related to the Dash/Encointer project.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top