More power to the rich?

[walletmonster]

There's more than 50% of all coins in masternodes, so if smaller coin holders had voting rights, they are still outvoted by master node holders. If your concerned about interest earned by large coin holders (master node owners) that is not available to small coin holders, then look into the interest you can potentially earn at an exchange, it's possibly every bit as good as what master node owners earn (and it's not inflationary).

I'm far more concerned about the outcome of voting if small coin holders had the power to effect the outcome of the process than the current voting process.

 

[Kim Koldtoft]

There's more than 50% of all coins in masternodes, so if smaller coin holders had voting rights, they are still outvoted by master node holders. If your concerned about interest earned by large coin holders (master node owners) that is not available to small coin holders, then look into the interest you can potentially earn at an exchange, it's possibly every bit as good as what master node owners earn (and it's not inflationary).

I'm far more concerned about the outcome of voting if small coin holders had the power to effect the outcome of the process than the current voting process.

That's good to know. Do you know if the scaling plans, are for the masternodes to hold the majority of funds, in a "main stream" model? If so, that would mean that there should be a lot of masternodes, or that the masternodes will be very very rich

 

[camosoul]

Snowflakes...