yes , catching fraudsters is the no 1 priority , just having a sim card verification is enough for venezuela ,but we went ahead to get a selfie as well to stop any potential fraud.
we are planning to implement liveness detection( if we get funded) which will eliminate fraud almost completely.
I think that asking random questions (from a big database) and implementing voice biometrics is much more safe than using face biometrics.
Anyway, I am against any kind of biometrics, as long as I am an anonymity advocate. Please do not include any kind of biomerics in your proposal. Using the power that money gives you , you should better organize and fund proof of individuality cryptoparties
, that unite people together and create a strong community feeling.
I would like to organize cryptoparties myself, but I want these cryptoparties to be organized as a consequence of pure faith. I am an anti-authoritarian, I detest power, money gives you power, so I detest money also. But as a consequence of my belief I have not the necessary money myself to financially incentivize people in order for them to participate into cryptoparties. But I support and encourage whoever rich/powerful person wants to use his power/money in order to fund cryptomeetings, for the people who are ignorants or they lack cryptofaith.
I dont know the statistics, whether the anonymity advocates are more than the biometrics advocates , among the masternodes owners. But you should take this into account, because including the biometrics issue in your proposal this may (or may not) cause more down votes than up votes. If you want to be sure you should ask a governance question to the masternodes, asking them what their core values are. But governace questions are expensive because stupids and spies bought masternodes in order to stop governance.
On the other hand the stupid, and the spies even more, are anonymity advocates, arent they?