what are the dark coin foundation donations used for?Like fernando said you can already donate to the foundation here: darkcoinfoundation.org/donate :smile:
what are the dark coin foundation donations used for?Like fernando said you can already donate to the foundation here: darkcoinfoundation.org/donate :smile:
https://www.darkcoinfoundation.org/about/objectives/what are the dark coin foundation donations used for?
Hi Evan and Team. I'd love to contribute something... Though time isn't one of them due to our own expanding businesses. That being said I would certainly love to donate on behalf of our winery and myself in maybe some kind of DASH contribution. Also we could certainly donate a wine gift to winners
. We could create a custom wine label just for this from a select barrel for example. Just some thoughts...
www.misconductwineco.com www.facebook.com/MisconductWineCo
Unfortunately for me...there is very little time to contribute. I'm on here and BCT alot during any breaks, traveling to and from engagements...as you'll see me post on BCT quite often. I never watch TV, movies or play games...so my one vice is being here with you guys....to my wife's sh-grin.
This is not about me though but how others and myself that may not have the skills or time needed can be of help and contribute.
There are many on here that may want to contribute something to help you guys out. Its the least we can do. We can contribute DASH's, PR ....anything else our team thinks is needed. Please advise.
I'll donate right now 100 DRK...please provide an address. Its not much...but I'm certainly ready to make further contributions.
Discussion about how the foundation should use its funds should be posted in the Foundation forum :wink:Just curious...is it possible to put up current donation drives that we need funds for on the foundation site? That way we can pick items we are personally attached too. Just a thought. As a foundation member do I have access to that site? Thanks. I'll move to a PM with you to discuss this so that I'm not hogging this thread.
One very important thing, our own UdjinM6 and Flare are already going to be part of this program, and they are already working full time Dash.
We still haven't approved any expenditure, but they should go to anything that the foundation supports. They are very limited right now, so we have been very conservative. I like your idea towards specific drives being published there. Or we could have a unique address but vote on the actions towards which we should use the funds... We'll have to open that discussion as soon as all the rebrading project is done and we can be back to workwhat are the dark coin foundation donations used for?
Does that mean they quit their daytimes jobs?
I already see the next tweet: "Dash decreases unemployment rate" :grin:
Lets say there are 2000 MN donators,Absolutely yes, Flare and Udjin are already working full time for Dash with no separate employment. That is why we really need Masternode Operators to support the Sponsor Program, we want to have more core developers and support the ones we have. This is really important for the project and to be able to realize all those goals we have set for the project as discussed by Evan in the last interview.
Please Masternode Operators we are in need of backers so we can add more developers to the team! See your investment multiply, we need to give in order to receive.
I think that is incredibly reasonable actually and the fact of the matter is, you realistically aren't going to miss that 1.5 DASH per masternode per month, especially if it means your payments and your 1k underlying increase in value due to new talent and feature rollouts.Lets say there are 2000 MN donators,
and one MN monthly current incoming is about 15 DRK,
and every 2000 donator agree donate 10%,
that is 1.5 DRK per MN per month, and 3000 DRK per month total.
What you think?
Edit: corrected %
Yes, 1.5 DRK is so small amount, thats really does not matter much.I think that is incredibly reasonable actually and the fact of the matter is, you realistically aren't going to miss that 1.5 DASH per masternode per month, especially if it means your payments and your 1k underlying increase in value due to new talent and feature rollouts.
Lets say there are 2000 MN donators,
and one MN monthly current incoming is about 15 DRK,
and every 2000 donator agree donate 10%,
that is 1.5 DRK per MN per month, and 3000 DRK per month total.
What you think?
Edit: corrected %
... but the problem is that it absolutely needs to be voluntary...
Integration Specialist
We’re looking for one person to work full time on some integrations we have in the pipeline. This person should be skilled at web-related technologies such as NodeJS, Python, Javascript and PHP. We have many integrations in the pipeline, so this is expected to be a part-to-full time role within the core team.
You certainly will not survive the backlash of a currency "tax" even if it went towards something good like developers creating new features and adding utility. No different than what conventional taxes are suppose to be partially used for--ex: improving infrastructure.Excellent initiative. I hope that we shall soon see same for PR-sponsorship. I think that this is as important as to sponsor a development - because in the short term could have a greater impact on DASH's price.
The problem with the current MasterNode operators is that many of them are bought DRK at the peak of prices and has not yet reached the area of profitability.
As soon as they'll find themselves in a significant profit - they should be able to feel confident and much more likely to sponsor money than now.
Including everything that affects the long-term success - development and so on.
The higher price is, the smaller percent is required to support a larger number of developers.
Therefore, we shouldn't underestimate PR also ... - this "spiral of DASH success" should grow evenly from all sides, not only through the development support.
But I still feel that this system is unfair - in an ideal system (ie such a system will have greatest competitive advantage) in theory, all recipients of new coins should sponsor an equal share (at the protocol level?). I understand that "taxes" may cause a mass attack of Trolls - but if it is possible to organize spending in decentralized way - The long-term advantages might be bigger than short-term black PR.
Sorry - of course Evan and you guys better feel this problem (and also no other coin collects "taxes" at the moment) - so i just pronouncing here my opinion, but trust you to find most effective way to proper finance all aspects of DASH's success.
Sure, voluntery is only option, but it needs massive PR campaign.If every Masternode Operator, would donate a percentage like that it would be perfect, but the problem is that it absolutely needs to be voluntary. So it is unlikely we would be able to achieve such a high percentage of compliance, so I think we will need those with vision to step up and help as much as possible.
I am committing a large percentage of my masternode earnings to fund a full slot, because I keep all my capital so it is really not too much of a burden and I expect to receive that back tenfold from an increase in value of my capital.
The other option is not having developers which long term would result in my capital going back to zero, so is not like we are being super altruistic is just the smart thing to do and what would guarantee the continuity of our assets.
The time when new developers could just buy in and work based on the coins they hold is already past, if we want this project to scale it is our responsibility as holders and investors to fund new developers.
Excellent initiative. I hope that we shall soon see same for PR-sponsorship. I think that this is as important as to sponsor a development - because in the short term could have a greater impact on DASH's price.
The problem with the current MasterNode operators is that many of them are bought DRK at the peak of prices and has not yet reached the area of profitability.
As soon as they'll find themselves in a significant profit - they should be able to feel confident and much more likely to sponsor money than now.
Including everything that affects the long-term success - development and so on.
The higher price is, the smaller percent is required to support a larger number of developers.
Therefore, we shouldn't underestimate PR also ... - this "spiral of DASH success" should grow evenly from all sides, not only through the development support.
But I still feel that this system is unfair - in an ideal system (ie such a system will have greatest competitive advantage) in theory, all recipients of new coins should sponsor an equal share (at the protocol level?). I understand that "taxes" may cause a mass attack of Trolls - but if it is possible to organize spending in decentralized way - The long-term advantages might be bigger than short-term black PR.
Sorry - of course Evan and you guys better feel this problem (and also no other coin collects "taxes" at the moment) - so i just pronouncing here my opinion, but trust you to find most effective way to proper finance all aspects of DASH's success.
You certainly will not survive the backlash of a currency "tax" even if it went towards something good like developers creating new features and adding utility. No different than what conventional taxes are suppose to be partially used for--ex: improving infrastructure.