Search results

...and thats the bad news. evans rebranding post was to unexpected and unclear to go the right way. some of my chats today were the opinion that XMR only go up because drk messed up with this announcement. but we have to deal with it. we need a decision in a crypto-like short time frame. I...

take a look... https://darkcointalk.org/threads/rebranding-followup.4266/page-4#post-45541

...hey, you do not know how expensive I am :wink:

without "D" version ...booohja.

stop. you have all you need... ...reduce it to the max. D is enough. behind the scenes it will be "darkcoin" for the one, "dash" for the other... its just D I work in the advertising-bizz - not that it should have any weight - but I see many companies around here paying a lot of money to...

...I would be happy to use my spy device for drk some day :tongue: to be honest, reading IT news the last months I get more and more the feeling there is no more really secure device or OS... it seems just more or less infiltrated. If drk should go more mainstream one day (verteo I know, its...

anybody saw my question about setting up multiple masternodes on one wallet (testnet only feature)? https://darkcointalk.org/threads/v0-11-1-x-instantx-release-testing.3826/page-34#post-40879

crazyfast.thanks!

please y7vZQoDTYFa9qYQatkkqGBzjze6uHN2Dfb

and how do I set up the next MN on the same wallet? do I need a separate adress with 1000 tDRK and the belonging masternodepriv key? or just additional ports like this: masternodeaddr=x.x.x.x:20001 masternodeaddr=x.x.x.x:20002

send some DS & iX out while mixing... is that the cause for offline? btw. strange icon

11.1.6 send all coins to a new adress in the wallet to DS from the scratch. the DS completion bar has missed my action and showed something strange. not a functional problem. just optical. btw. the wallet feels sluggish quite often

just a idea. would be great to see how I send out the coins (recent transaction & transaction details). a DS & instantX transfer switch to this after reopening the wallet : Status: 95 confirmations this would be better in my opinion: Status: 95 confirmations (DS & iX) ...maybe with smart...

interesting! this transactions you send me is still unconfirmed here after half an hour. I mix some coins at the moment - could this mess up instantX? any need for screenshots? TanteStefana. do you like to give me a ping pong tDRK adress? thanks

send some tDRK out via instantX and DS. wow... crazy fast. Status: 7 confirmations (verified via instantx), broadcast through 1 node(s)Date: 03.02.15 09:38To: y2wLS8cqAkyjkSR3Cfiy1ezWbQzJkTmzmXDebit: -555.00 tDRKTransaction fee: -0.00555 tDRKNet amount: -555.00555 tDRKTransaction ID...

really important point. I read your comment on BTCtalk and agree. This version hopping should not be on the mainnet. Its time consuming and quite dangerous for normal users. Worst case they loose some of their money and in that case the trust in darkcoin. I tried to do my best in testing the...

thanks for testing moli. seems to work for you. this is not the case with my linux wallet. and it makes me wonder that you don't have to select the coins manually. I have the same feature as thelonecrouton describes here...

...had this too. So I think it is reproduceable.

...a wallet where I could not use DS anymore. I'm not sure a screenshot could tell you more... but if you like. Could you do me a favor... and just try to make the same steps with your wallet... maybe you could verify my problem: 1) make a fresh wallet with some tDRK in it. 2) mix the coins...

thanks moli. with a clean wallet it works as expected, as I wrote. but I'm able to reproduce this with the fresh wallet. a reciept for a unmixable (tm) wallet: first mix some coins... then try to clean up (for new mixing tests) by sending all to a new recieving address in the same wallet...